And ruled a no contesthttps://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=767415 Why does it still say Fury win over Hammer on his record?
I thought Fury’s win against Hammer was overturned
Collapse
-
Tags: None
-
Boxrec refused to change it because it was such a dominant win by Fury & the details of the UKAD case were sketchy.
Some loser on here actually emailed the WBO about it last year, obviously he got told to f*** off and the poster went AWOL soon after.Comment
-
HahahahahahhhahahahahaComment
-
Tyson Fury stated to Parody magazine "I knew that the only way I could beat the legendary Christian Hammer, was to be juiced to the grills. I was also eating uncastrated wild boar every day. After this fight, I have went on to beat Wlad and Wilder, but I know, deep down in my Gypsy soul, that I could never beat Christian Hammer fair and square."Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by BoxingsceneUK Anti-Doping Agency (UKAD) declared that Hammer's loss to Tyson Fury is now a no-contest.
The wording of the order reads: "All titles, prize money and ranking points that [Fury] secured as a result of his victory in that fight are forfeited."
Christian Hammer (26 fights, 22 wins, 4 defeats) is coming up on the most important battle of his career. On December 15 he will take on Russia's Alexander Povetkin (33 fights, 32 wins, 1 defeat) in a final WBO, WBA world title eliminator - with the winner being in line for a crack at world champions Joseph Parker and Anthony Joshua.
Yes, Tyson robbed Christian Hammer of his biggest pay-day and a shot at the long reigning lineal HW champion Wladimir Klitschko, and the potential millions that Tyson went on to bank after that. Boxrec is not a authority in the world of boxing, apparently they refuse to acknowledge UKAD's ruling.
Its a disgrace that TILL THIS DAY! Casuals look at Christian Hammer's record on boxrec and see a loss to the Gypsy-Bum.Comment
Comment