How would you grade golovkins career (A* to F)

[Boxing_1013]

A minus....

[daggum]

Pvssy-g lost to Jacobs, Nelo twice & they say to D-Chenko too..What a career

who is they? you don't even have your own opinion? i seriously doubt you even watched the fight lol. this is what happens when you have no credibility. follower types like you just take "their" word for it

[aboutfkntime]

You still trying to talk to me ****wit? I ain't even reading your posts anymore.

how the fcuk is Golovkin ranked " A " ? ... alongside Mayweather and Pacquiao... you silly cvnt?

[aboutfkntime]

as usual... you see a whole lot of ******ity in a Golovkin thread

all by the same usual suspects LMAO

[Citizen Koba]

how the fcuk is Golovkin ranked " A " ? ... alongside Mayweather and Pacquiao... you silly cvnt?

I said A+ to C depending on what scale you use you ****** tool, now take your illiterate ass away and come back when you got something useful to add.

[-Kev-]

He became very popular in relation to his resume. Mostly from very good advertising, KO’s over C level fighters, his coach promoting him as someone who will fight anyone in any weight class. I felt he lost against Canelo, Jacobs, and Derevyanchenko.

He was looking for “big fights”, and wanted recognition by beating the best and when a really big fight came up a weight class above, he didn’t want any part of it, vs Ward. But then he wanted Chavez Jr at the same weight class, and had no issue fighting Brook, a guy coming up from 147lbs at Middleweight.

The fighters who “ducked” him like Sturm, he wasn’t that good. An aging Sergio Martinez? A fighter of Martinez age and caliber won’t be going after up and coming fighters, ever. An aging Miguel Cotto? Same as Martinez.

So GGG’s storyline is full of comedy to be honest. But I will be fair and give him a B. Because he is actually a very good fighter, just doesn’t have much down there in the form of balls and his promoter and coach helped him develop the crazy fanbase he got by talking about he can beat anyone from 154 to 175 but in reality it was really from 147 to 160.

[aboutfkntime]

I said A+ to C depending on what scale you use you ****** tool, now take your illiterate ass away and come back when you got something useful to add.

YOU said... you rank Golovkin " A "... alongside Mayweather and Pacquiao

you could place GGG as a B (though I'd still personally say A)

... you dumb cvnt LMAO

tell us that story again... about how you are definitely not one of Hypekins idiot fanboys loooool

how the fcuk could Golovkin possibly be ranked alongside Mayweather and Pacquiao you dribbling spastic?

[aboutfkntime]

He became very popular in relation to his resume. Mostly from very good advertising, KO’s over C level fighters, his coach promoting him as someone who will fight anyone in any weight class. I felt he lost against Canelo, Jacobs, and Derevyanchenko.

He was looking for “big fights”, and wanted recognition by beating the best and when a really big fight came up a weight class above, he didn’t want any part of it, vs Ward. But then he wanted Chavez Jr at the same weight class, and had no issue fighting Brook, a guy coming up from 147lbs at Middleweight.

The fighters who “ducked” him like Sturm, he wasn’t that good. An aging Sergio Martinez? A fighter of Martinez age and caliber won’t be going after up and coming fighters, ever. An aging Miguel Cotto? Same as Martinez.

So GGG’s storyline is full of comedy to be honest. But I will be fair and give him a B. Because he is actually a very good fighter, just doesn’t have much down there in the form of balls and his promoter and coach helped him develop the crazy fanbase he got by talking about he can beat anyone from 154 to 175 but in reality it was really from 147 to 160.

that is FAR more accurate than the usual fanboy dribble in this thread

to form any other rational conclusion... you would need to forget about all the hype/bullshlt that Golovkin failed to live up to... you would need to forget about all the world-class opponents that Golovkin avoided... and you would need to forget that Golovkin struggled when he finally stepped up in class

Golovkin has NO career-defining or signature win... the best name on his resume was a HUGE underdog

I rate him B-

[strykr619]

Mayweather and Pacquiao both over-achieved, and both have numerous genuine accomplishments in the sport... Golovkin under-achieved, and will retire with little/no genuine accomplishments

so yea, I definitely do not grade Golovkin... " A "

His under achieving its not really his fault thou, Combination of avoidance by opponents and weak comp.

I give his career a B overall.

[Citizen Koba]

YOU said... you rank Golovkin " A "... alongside Mayweather and Pacquiao



... you dumb cvnt LMAO

tell us that story again... about how you are definitely not one of Hypekins idiot fanboys loooool

how the fcuk could Golovkin possibly be ranked alongside Mayweather and Pacquiao you dribbling spastic?

You're literally too dumb to waste more time on scrappy.