Comments Thread For: Tyson Fury-Deontay Wilder Rematch - CompuBox Punch Stats

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46539
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: Tyson Fury-Deontay Wilder Rematch - CompuBox Punch Stats

    Tyson Fury dominated, outlanding Deontay Wilder 82-34 in total punches to capture the WBC heavyweight title with a seventh round stoppage. Fury landed 58 power punches in less than 7 rounds of rematch after landing just 38 in the first fight. Wilder landed just 34 punches all fight and just 18 power shots.
    [Click Here To Read More]
  • JesusPangs
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Feb 2019
    • 246
    • 35
    • 1
    • 7,613

    #2
    These numbers don't do show what a complete assault it was. People in the crowd looked like they were watching a father beat his son. They looked uncomfortable. Beautiful performance by Fury. Respect to Wilder, but that was a beating.

    Comment

    • True That
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Aug 2017
      • 3151
      • 167
      • 771
      • 34,492

      #3
      Woo-Wee!!! Wilder got his ass whooped!

      Comment

      • jackblack008
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Oct 2016
        • 2951
        • 662
        • 263
        • 26,544

        #4
        One of my homies was ringside. He said Fury battered him from center to corner and back to center. May be his soul taken away...

        Comment

        • Stephenadams5
          Amateur
          Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
          • Feb 2020
          • 1
          • 0
          • 0
          • 1,032

          #5
          Stats

          The punch landed stats on Tyson fury’s behalf is beyond accurate. Sky bet knows it’s wrong but because your stats are wrong they won’t give the thousands of people their money

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP