Should VADA do Random Visits whenever a Boxer tweets intoxicated videos?

[Thuglife Nelo]

Like when Benavidez got stripped by the WBC...

Was that Haymon having fun to smear against the Mexican?

People been saying this tho.... But tbh if they were its not a big deal imo knowing the history of the sport.

Them not seeking big fights the right way is my issue

[Pago007]

No because then it's not random

[Citizen Koba]

No because then it's not random

Beat me to it...

[Thuglife Nelo]

No because then it's not random

LOL. I don’t you understand the irony of random. are you assuming that after an intoxicated video happens the fighters are able to successfully flush things out the following day or removal within the week? Nano traces can be easily picked up any day of the week for *******. How would the Charlos know how to evade it?

[Thuglife Nelo]

Beat me to it...

Lol. That’s not how drug testing works. You’re focused on a random visit when the point is you can easily easily pick up nano traces anytime of the week.

[Citizen Koba]

Like when Benavidez got stripped by the WBC...

Was that Haymon having fun to smear against the Mexican?

I don't think it's a terrible idea that there's something like the NACs enhanced testing program in place across the US that gives 'em a right to test any fighter licenced by em or even requesting a licence if they think there's a likelihood of violation. That's what happened to JCC Jr I think, though the systemis potentially open to abuse in targeting fighters for testing unequally. I ain't in favour of jumping on guys just for partying but it would allow potential offenders or repeat offenders to be targeted outside of the usual testing windows.

[Citizen Koba]

Lol. That’s not how drug testing works. You’re focused on a random visit when the point is you can easily easily pick up nano traces anytime of the week.

I was being facetious, man. It was semantic humour.

For a fuller and more measured reply look at the following post.

[KillaMane26]

How many times you gonna quote me? I said "IMO"