Which one is better to fight against as an amateur

[Bxzel145]

The one who is a Mayweather/Broner defensive tactician type of boxer
or
The one who is Pacquiao/tenacious purely offensive type of fighter?

[Gideon lock]

Definitely defensive, less chance of getting obliterated physically you'll just get frustrated a bit mentally trying to land punches instead of taking loads and getting knocked out.

[Gideon lock]

I will say that i dont consider broner a defensive tactician though.

[Dariusz]

Amateurs fight 3 rounds only, thus, they are much more energetic in the ring. Defensive strategy can rarely bring success in amateur fights.

[Robbie Barrett]

Pacquiao style. He's going to give you much more opportunities to land. Mayweather would just pick you apart. That's why technical fighters/movers usually do better than gung ho fighters in the ams.