Golovkin made all his supporters fools yet we still have some defending him.

[GGG Gloveking]

its consistent with what any champion would do between facing atgs.

its inconsistent with your logic, therefore you must explain why you disagree that between 2 atgs a champ doesnt deserve something a bit easier.

Inconsistency is when you claim that a fighter needs a belt or "get in queue", when the facts suggest otherwise. That's inconsistent, and you need to address that.

[GGG Gloveking]

canelo was champion at 3 different weights already, with multititles to boot, including the then current lineal MW.

which lie do you want to maintain again? I'm losing track now.

Stop it. Just stop lying. Canelo was not a MW champ prior to Cotto.

[DreamFighter]

Inconsistency is when you claim that a fighter needs a belt or "get in queue", when the facts suggest otherwise. That's inconsistent, and you need to address that.

facing 2 ATGs with one weaker opponent Geale in between doesnt address being a champion, really?

Do you think Cotto should have faced 3 in a row, should he have added Andre Ward between Martinez and Canelo? Barely anyone has ever fought at that level three in a row in the history of boxing.

the weaker opponent Geale was, notably, Golovkin's best opponent to that date.

[GGG Gloveking]

facing 2 ATGs with one weaker opponent Geale in between doesnt address being a champion, really?

Do you think Cotto should have faced 3 in a row, should he have added Andre Ward between Martinez and Canelo? Barely anyone has ever fought at that level three in a row in the history of boxing.

the weaker opponent Geale was, notably, Golovkin's best opponent to that date.

What do I think? I think fighting Daniel Geale is inconsistent with the statement "non champions get in queue."

That's what I think.

[DreamFighter]

What do I think? I think fighting Daniel Geale is inconsistent with the statement "non champions get in queue."

That's what I think.

you also think Golovkin is great for fighting years and years of mediocrity.

go figure.

funniest i ever seen someone having a go at a champ for facing 2 atgs in three fights, u the man.

[Robbie Barrett]

I don't think Golovkin has ever taken a 14 months interval between fights.

Now, if you're going to jump in the conversation, maybe you can explain why Cotto never fought his mandatory?

Because Golovkin took step aside money.

[GGG Gloveking]

you also think Golovkin is great for fighting years and years of mediocrity.

go figure.

funniest i ever seen someone having a go at a champ for facing 2 atgs in three fights, u the man.

Trying to pivot again? You're getting a long ways away from "Cotto didn't fight Golovkin because he didn't bring a belt (that he won in the ring) to the table."

What belt Geale brought?

[GGG Gloveking]

Because Golovkin took step aside money.

Thank you. That's the real answer.

Golovkin didn't fight Cotto, because Cotto paid him money to not have to fight.

It has nothing to do with "non champs get in queue."

[Robbie Barrett]

Thank you. That's the real answer.

Golovkin didn't fight Cotto, because Cotto paid him money to not have to fight.

It has nothing to do with "non champs get in queue."

So you can't say Cotto ducked him. Golovkin had a choice and he chose step aside money.

[DreamFighter]

Trying to pivot again? You're getting a long ways away from "Cotto didn't fight Golovkin because he didn't bring a belt (that he won in the ring) to the table."

What belt Geale brought?

i can see you are going to continue arguing that a champion should fight 3 greats consecutively, whilst you are also defending golovkin's resume.

bit late now, but you should have taken the chance i gave u to edit your argument. dont say i didnt try to giv u a leg.