Would you criticize Pacquiao for fighting Taylor-Ramirez winner?

[Thraxox]

Lets say Pacquiao bests DSG assuming he wins and Pacquiao sees that Ramirez and Taylor unification match and decides to lay down his welterweight run for the chance of undisputed further enhancing his already legendary legacy.

Would you criticize him for that? Because to me fighting the Ramirez Taylor winner is just picky.

[Gentblue]

No and who ever would is a pure hater of the highest order......

[Mammoth]

Nobody would.............

[PAC-BOY]

How could any true boxing fan?

[Ca$ual Fan]

That is a fine and decent scrap. No way he'd be criticized for that.

The only way he'd be criticized is when he joins the Mcgregor circus club

[Roadblock]

Id much rather Porter or Crawford , Porter vs Manny would be a great all action fight .

[JimmyValmer]

Lets say Pacquiao bests DSG assuming he wins and Pacquiao sees that Ramirez and Taylor unification match and decides to lay down his welterweight run for the chance of undisputed further enhancing his already legendary legacy.

Would you criticize him for that? Because to me fighting the Ramirez Taylor winner is just picky.

It won't happen tho. Both fighters are on Top Rank and we all know Manny won't return to Bob ever again. Keep dreaming tho.

[boliodogs]

No. He is just a big lightweight anyway and he is still a monster at 140 even at his old age. He never was a true welterweight but he was and is good enough to beat most of the best welterweights. If he wants to fight at 140 I like that.

[UNBIASED BOXING]

Pacquiao is 41 years old.

By the time this bout takes place, he would probably be 42.

I don't think anyone would fault Pacquiao for fighting a tomato can at this point in his career, much less, an undisputed champion at 140 lbs.

I mean, everyone still wants him to retire soon (although he would never have beaten Thurman if he did after Horn).

[Bob Haymon]

It would be a step up from Broner, Thurman, and Garcia.