Comments Thread For: Wilder-Fury Rematch - Pay-Per-View Undercard Information

[Kezzer]

Oh dear this is bad

[Pigeons]

Yup, I'm streaming this one again.

[Corelone]

Why can't they just post who is fighting who?

An undercard doesn't warrant a ****ing article and I'm not reading that ****.

Like the menu at Mac's. Bland.

[pillowfists98]

Promoters are smart enough to know that most people only care about the main event anyway. Why spend a bunch of money stacking the undercard when it would only add about 10-15K more buys.

[MisanthropicNY]

This is why Boxing will remain just a small niche sport. UFC events give you an entire night of good match ups and boxing gives you a main event with a boring undercard that you hope you won't fall asleep to before the event. You're paying $100 for one fight that the judges will likely get wrong again if it goes to the score card? Fk boxing.

[Dariusz]

Kownacki should be fighting in an eliminate fight.

They all are afraid of Kownacki. I wonder when (if ever) Kownacki will be given a title fight.

[uppercut510]

whos fighting who???

[Angeljuice]

I mean he won the first 4 rounds against Wilder

It isn't hard to win rounds against Wilder. My Granny would win rounds against Wilder and she's been dead for 40 years.

[Angeljuice]

Have you ever seen Martin fight its literally like watching the youtubers in the ring. He's slow and unskilled but apparently one of the luckiest people in boxing. Kownacki should be fighting in an eliminate fight.

I saw Martin fight Joshua, I don't think anything else needs to be said.

We have one guy who poses rather than punches pitted against one that curls up in a ball when you get too close.

Charles Martin's nickname should be "the hedgehog".

[Angeljuice]

I’m talking about college football not boxing you freakin idiot. Stick to soccer it’s the only thing you snaggle tooth mutha****as know.

The Brits created modern boxing in the 1880's, yet another world sport we delivered.
You have created..... Zero... Not a single American sport is an international standard. Not one.