Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Steward: Fury Can Also Get You Out of There With One Punch

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by 1hourRun View Post
    I browsed Tyson's record to find evidence that may substantiate Sugar-Hill Steward's over the top statement regarding Fury's '' ONE-PUNCH '' knock-out ability.

    Here is what I found:



    Mathew Ellis, a 35 year old euro-bum challenging a young Tyson Fury after SIX prior stoppages. Notable names like, Audley Harrison and Enzo Maccarinelli done Ellis before Tyson.




    Marcelo Nascimento, Nascimento only fought ONE ranked opponent leading to Fury. This guy went on to loose to everybody usually by KO and is still taking losses. Currently, hes been stopped 13 times, with a total of 20 losses.

    Marcelo Nascimento was a glass-jaw bum.

    I also caught something very interesting, as you can see in these gifs, Tyson still had hair when he was getting clear KO's ; this has lead me to suspect that Tyson was heavily juicing at this unregulated stage as a prospect. Is it a coincidence that when Tyson went bald, that these violent KO's also disappeared?

    As some of you may know, doping may lead to hair-loss and as Tyson climbed the rankings, he was subjected to more drug-testing. Therefore, as Fury's doping and Hair-line decreased so did the KO's.

    And WOW! I'm looking at all of Deontay's clear KO's on boxrec, my wrist is tired of scrolling down.
    20% of men go bald in their 20's, 30% go bald in their 30's and 40% in their 40's.
    90% of men go bald, baldness is a result of exposure to testosterone.

    I think it is far more likely that Fury went bald naturally than some weird conspiracy theory.

    You looked at Wilders record? Does it tell you all the great boxers he has dodged?
    Look at what I read today;

    "DEONTAY WILDER’S former co-promoter Lou DiBella claimed he was fired by the WBC champion for trying to set up a fight with Anthony Joshua."

    The truth is out.

    Comment


    • #32
      Take into consideration what type of boxers both are, you should be able to conclude who will learn more from first fight and do better in rematch.
      Fury is hard to nail with more than one punch at a time which might not matter as wilder needs one punch. But Tyson is hard to nail so wilder will likely face same problems.
      Which must favour tyson

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by BillyBoxing View Post
        TBH who cares what happened in the Wallin fight, before the first Wilder fight, Fury only had fought Seferi and Pianeta who are worst opponents than Wallin and Fury looked average at best, could not stop Pianetta.

        People will never learn with Fury and boxing.

        They overlooked him in the Klit fight and the first Wilder fight, still doing the same.

        They still overlooking the boxer vs puncher when the boxer wins 80% of times, Fury won last time by the way IMO

        I understand that a nutjob like Fury is not a safe bet. But you CAN'T overlook him.
        people care about the Wallin fight because it was recent

        Nobody is overlooking Fury

        The topic is his one punch KO power which most will argue he doesnt have. Try to stick to the topic.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by BillyBoxing View Post
          Fury hurt Wilder a couple of times.

          Wilder got rocked in the fight and had his face pretty light up post fight.

          And Fury had that Klit fight game plan herky jerky style to pot shot his route into a UD.

          When he tried to back him up, he did successfully.

          Fury has seen weaknesses I think, we saw it too, the thing is most people only remember that 12th round brutal knock down.


          But Fury will outbox him, beat him worst this time iMO. I think Fury will box better and more efficiently, lead the fight again...
          Until Wilder catch Fury with something big...LOL...because Wilder got that one punch game changer, OR NOT.

          But Wilder is not winning by decision. He's getting his ears boxed off anyway. it's KO or nothing for him.
          You seem real high on Fury would you be willing to put your money where your mouth is? if not, maybe you should ease up a little. Youre acting like Fury didnt struggle with a bum by the name of Wallin the couldve and should've gotten a TKO win against him...

          Comment


          • #35
            Trainer is talking way to
            Much , being Emanuels nephew is the only comparison he has I think , showing his in experience on the big stage by talking to much , trying to overdo the mind games that that have no bearing on 2 guys that more about each other than their family's do .. showing a weak I reckon to the opposition ..

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by 2Shotz View Post
              Everyone seems to be talking about Fury should do much better in the rematch given that it’s his second go and he performed quite well in the first. Same could be said for Wilder. He knocked Fury down in the first fight and has since scored two more pulverizing KO’s, demonstrating a higher sense of position and patience in the rematch w Ortiz. Let’s see what improvements Wilder brings to the rematch. I believe he’s gonna KO Fury to kingdom come and probably early. No undertaker rising this time!
              —-/

              That’s my prediction too. And it’s not to underrate or underestimate Fury. Fury is a good boxer but not as quick or athletic as Wilder.
              Fury will trouble any HW out there. His style is just that way.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Jack_***** View Post
                Yeah. That’s probably why his dad, John Fury went bald at a similar age. Nothing to do with genetics.
                I see your reasoning but.....inherited baldness comes from the mother not the father. If Tysons baldness is genetic (which it probably is) you need to look at his uncles which of course are her brothers.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by 1hourRun View Post


                  I dont know man, seems like its only Tyson that went bald. Have you seen the rest of 'Gypsy' John's sons? The fat one and the other two that box -- Gay Tommy! Yeah, thats the one.
                  Also as I pointed out to Jack, inherited baldness always comes from the mother's side of the family and not the father's.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Most hw boxers can be one punch guys, but the way Tyson hits is not that of one man trying to ko his opponent.

                    Perhaps, if trained to, he can change the way he hits, but at which cost? Perhaps he would also be a better target, in that way. And that would be terrible, against Wilder.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Calibaloc View Post
                      You seem real high on Fury would you be willing to put your money where your mouth is? if not, maybe you should ease up a little. Youre acting like Fury didnt struggle with a bum by the name of Wallin the couldve and should've gotten a TKO win against him...
                      i'm not that high on Fury, you don't have to be great to outbox Wilder

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP