Pacquiao vs. JMM, which one is better overall

[Fangedgrowl]

Pac is 2-1-1 against Marquez but regardless if you want to point to the ko, Pac is clearly way greater than Marquez overall the resumes and accomplishments aren’t in the same league

EXACTLY. Marquez or Bradley whose better then, They both had one victory over Pac, yet Bradley dominated Marquez.

[Arj Guy]

EXACTLY. Marquez or Bradley whose better then, They both had one victory over Pac, yet Bradley dominated Marquez.

Marquez is better than Bradley overall he had a better career. This idea that if you beat a fighter you’re greater overall is obviously nonsense. Kirkland Lang and Benitez aren’t greater than Duran but they beat him

[Fangedgrowl]

Marquez is better than Bradley overall he had a better career. This idea that if you beat a fighter you’re greater overall is obviously nonsense. Kirkland Lang and Benitez aren’t greater than Duran but they beat him

Maybe , Actually Barrera and Morales had better careers than Marquez in bigger fights more often and fought alot of top names. Of course Marquez was avoided becuase of his style. However Pac wouldnt struggle with Juan Diaz or Michael Katsidis either.

[boliodogs]

Pacquiao is better and both will be remembered for ever but Pacquiao will always be more famous. Pacquiao would have won a 5th fight in my opinion and that is why Marquez refused a 5th fight in spite of huge money offers. They were evenly matched against each other but Pacquiao was the better fighter against other top fighters.

[Fangedgrowl]

Pacquiao is better and both will be remembered for ever but Pacquiao will always be more famous. Pacquiao would have won a 5th fight in my opinion and that is why Marquez refused a 5th fight in spite of huge money offers. They were evenly matched against each other but Pacquiao was the better fighter against other top fighters.

Thank you Bolio best answer so far!

[Bundt]

Pacquiao is better. Why? Because Pacquiao made a lot more pesos that Marquez. That’s an important metric on this site.

[Real King Kong]

I always preferred marquez, but pac has achieved more. he's undoubtably greater overall.

[GhostofDempsey]

Pacquiao. Take into account he was robbed of a win in the first fight because Clements doesn't know how to count knockdowns and he is up 3-1. But let's just say they only fought once and Pac loses by KO, that still doesn't make JMM the overall better fighter. Look at Duran vs. Hearns. Tommy brutally KO'd Duran, yet Duran is considered by far a better P4P fighter all-time.

[Dodger07]

Pacquiao is greater because his resume, accomplishments and overall impact on the sport of boxing trounce Marquez. But H2H, Marquez just has a style that will always be a problem for Pac to deal with.