Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What fighter has the weakest resume to be widely considered a top 3 p4p fighter

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post

    on style/skills/form, the main considerations... Crawford is the man

    the only real arguments are Lomachenko and Canelo

    Lomachenko is simply phenomenal

    Canelo is outstanding, with HUGE balls and the best resume by far
    You realize that Carnelo never had this happen from a nobody, yes? Just asking


    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by revelated View Post
      Bro, I think Calslappy was hyped too much and his slap fest stoppages were a joke.

      But you have to be named when you have Jones, Hopkins AND Eubank on the resume.
      kesler was his best win, even though mikkel was injured at the time.

      Comment


      • #13
        Crawford since he can't get in the ring with any of the PBC guys. I feel he's better than all of them, just hasn't had the opportunity to prove it.

        Comment


        • #14
          GGG's resume was trash a few years ago when he was considered top 3. It has definetly gotten better in more recent times.

          Comment


          • #15
            Crawford and its not even close

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by blitted_master View Post
              Crawford since he can't get in the ring with any of the PBC guys. I feel he's better than all of them, just hasn't had the opportunity to prove it.
              Did you see his last performance against Eurobum Mean Machine? He got caught by a slow bum with a nice right and was even dropped.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by boliodogs View Post
                Yes indeed he is pound for pound one of the best. You have pound for pound mixed up with resume. If it was resume they would call it resume and not pound for pound. Resume is who you fought and how you did with them. Pound for pound is just how good you think a fighter is for his pounds and who you think he can beat. His potential. He doesn't have to have beaten top guys. If most people think he can beat the top guys based on recent fights then he gets a high pound for pound rating.
                So p4p has nothing to do with resume?? Lol

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by MinuteMaid5
                  Tank Davis
                  Who ever considered Tank a top 3 p4p fighter?

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by NORMNEALON View Post
                    So p4p has nothing to do with resume?? Lol


                    of course not

                    otherwise Pac would clearly be #1... and GGG would never have been ranked

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
                      of course not

                      otherwise Pac would clearly be #1... and GGG would never have been ranked
                      Current resume and opposition is 110% part of p4p why the hell do u think bud dont got that recognition

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP