Is Wilder A Master At Getting Easier Fights
Collapse
-
unification=2 CURRENT CHAMPIONS FIGHTING..Wlad was not a champWhen more then one belt is on the line it’s called unification,again Wilder fans really showing how uneducated they are .
All the titles Wilder got which is one was vacated by Vitali the difference is AJ went to look for more after Martin and fought the perceived second best fighter at the time Wlad who Finkel said Wilder was a baby and couldn’t fight , again showing you guys cannot think ahead and contradict every post on the forum .
you are trying to slam Wilder for beating a guy who won a vacant title..BUT
Martin-won a vacant title ..VIA INJURY
Parker-won a vacant title
He fought Wlad WHO HAD NO TITLE PERIOD AND THERE WAS A VACANT TITLE ON THE LINE..
So what is the point you are trying to make man???Comment
-
I know. Its cuz we keep pulling you up on your lies and BS. Your the idiot that is claiming Wilder stepped it by not fighting. WTF?Comment
-
it is the exact same point, no difference whatsoever
Wilder OBVIOUSLY stepped up his opponent selection when he signed to fight Povetkin... his opponents before/after clearly prove that
that was 4 years ago
this is just a crybaby thread that is stuck in the past
get over it... Wilder is about to lose to Tyson Fury anywaysComment
-
FACT: it is OBVIOUS that Wilder stepped up his opponent selection when he signed to fight Povetkin... his opponents before/after CLEARLY prove that
you are just a typical pacstain > golov-tard level fanboy
and claiming that your guy stepped up by not fighting, is what you shlthead Golovkin fans have been doing for yearsComment
-
Unification isn’t two champions fighting if the belts became vacant with one fighter holding a belt. That’s your definition which is a lie ,even that WBC quack knows this and that’s why it was actually a official unification fight ,don’t you understand that, you can count past one right because that’s what unification means which is combining ? Haunification=2 CURRENT CHAMPIONS FIGHTING..Wlad was not a champ
you are trying to slam Wilder for beating a guy who won a vacant title..BUT
Martin-won a vacant title ..VIA INJURY
Parker-won a vacant title
He fought Wlad WHO HAD NO TITLE PERIOD AND THERE WAS A VACANT TITLE ON THE LINE..
So what is the point you are trying to make man???
The point is which even a little boy could understand is you said AJ won a vacant title when he won his title the same way Wilder did after his opponent won in a vacant bout ? If that’s the case then Wilder won his by the same method ,wow . Ha
Edit : Wilder won his title from Stiverne who defeated Arreola for it.
AJ won his off Martin off Glaskov who he defeated for his .
Do you not see the irony here discrediting AJ over a belt he won the same way ? HaLast edited by REDEEMER; 01-19-2020, 11:27 PM.Comment
-
I didn’t mention GGG so no .FACT: it is OBVIOUS that Wilder stepped up his opponent selection when he signed to fight Povetkin... his opponents before/after CLEARLY prove that
you are just a typical pacstain > golov-tard level fanboy
and claiming that your guy stepped up by not fighting, is what you shlthead Golovkin fans have been doing for yearsComment
-
Comment
-
martin did not defeat anyone..the guy got injured..wtf are you on about??Unification isn’t two champions fighting if the belts became vacant with one fighter holding a belt. That’s your definition which is a lie ,even that WBC quack knows this and that’s why it was actually a official unification fight ,don’t you understand that, you can count past one right because that’s what unification means which is combining ? Ha
The point is which even a little boy could understand is you said AJ won a vacant title when he won his title the same way Wilder did after his opponent won in a vacant bout ? If that’s the case then Wilder won his by the same method ,wow . Ha
Edit : Wilder won his title from Stiverne who defeated Arreola for it.
AJ won his off Martin off Glaskov who he defeated for his .
Do you not see the irony here discrediting AJ over a belt he won the same way ? Ha
Comment
-
your entire point was slamming Wilder for beating Stiverne A FIGHT YOU THOUGHT WAS FOR A VACANT TITLE
Once proven wrong YOU TRIED TO SLAM HIM FOR BEATING A GUY WHO WON A VACANT TITLE
Then once i point out AJ WON ALL OF HIS TITLE FROM GUYS WITH VACANT TITLES OR JUST FOUGHT FOR A VACANT TITLE..now you try to name call and desperately find away out of the hole you dug for yourself..Comment
Comment