Charlo/Derevyanchenko: "Charlo's DUCKING!!". Crawford/Porter: "He don't need Porter"

[Combat Talk Radio]

Seriously, this has got to be one of the most notorious examples of hypocrisy on NSB I've ever seen.

I want see Derevyanchenko fight Charlo. I think it would be a fan-friendly fight. My problem isn't with the fight. My problem is why NSB refuses to admit that Crawford DUCKED Porter when it's the exact same reasoning as with Charlo.

Charlo is fighting the B-tier. Crawford is fighting the B-tier.

Charlo sparks the B-tier and gets called a ducker.

Crawford sparks the B-tier, avoids Porter who is off a loss and gets called #1 P4P.

Why? Why is this your thought process?? It don't make no damn sense.

[rickJen]

You skip the part where Derevy has been living in the same street as Charlo.
Yet you're still not willing to admit Charlo basically avoided the guy all these years.
Why is that?

You can't say the same thing with Porter/Crawford.

Any thoughts on why Porter is the only one interested in Crawford?
You give a pass on Thurman, Spence and Garcia?

[Dreamer213]

Seriously, this has got to be one of the most notorious examples of hypocrisy on NSB I've ever seen.

I want see Derevyanchenko fight Charlo. I think it would be a fan-friendly fight. My problem isn't with the fight. My problem is why NSB refuses to admit that Crawford DUCKED Porter when it's the exact same reasoning as with Charlo.

Charlo is fighting the B-tier. Crawford is fighting the B-tier.

Charlo sparks the B-tier and gets called a ducker.

Crawford sparks the B-tier, avoids Porter who is off a loss and gets called #1 P4P.

Why? Why is this your thought process?? It don't make no damn sense.

Agree with everything you said. Crawford needs to fight Porter and Charlo needs to fight Sergey.
Both great fights that are evenly matched..

[Combat Talk Radio]

You skip the part where Derevy has been living in the same street as Charlo.
Yet you're still not willing to admit Charlo basically avoided the guy all these years.
Why is that?

First of all, it was CRAWFORD who said there is no 'other side of the street'.



So which is it bro? They can't both be the correct answer.

Either

(A) Crawford can't fight Porter because he's on the 'wrong side of the street', so he won't get Spence for the same reason. OR

(B) There is no 'wrong side of the street' in which case there's no barrier to fighting Porter and he would earn Spence by beating Porter. Danny isn't available, Thurman is still injured, Manny is chasing McGregor, and Crawford is fresh off a poor showing against a B-level. He needs a signature fight against a threat. Who else would be a threat besides Ugas?

Once he beats a threat, Spence will have healed and we can talk about that fight.

As far as Charlo I've said repeatedly he should fight Sergiy. But we can't say he's ducking yet Crawford isn't.

[Robbie Barrett]

These PBC fans are tarded. That's all there is to it. Another example of how tarded they are is they say Wilder deserves 50% against Joshua, but then they say Crawford doesn't deserve 50% against Spence.

[Combat Talk Radio]

These PBC fans are tarded. That's all there is to it. Another example of how tarded they are is they say Wilder deserves 50% against Joshua, but then they say Crawford doesn't deserve 50% against Spence.

There's a difference.

Wilder is known in heavyweight boxing, and has faced three threats, winning against two of them twice. Wilder has been on TV and media including shows and commercials.

Crawford has not faced one threat yet. Nobody knows who he is outside of hardcores. Casuals just know him as That Guy That Hit Amir Khan With A Low Blow.

[Robbie Barrett]

There's a difference.

Wilder is known in heavyweight boxing, and has faced three threats, winning against two of them twice. Wilder has been on TV and media including shows and commercials.

Crawford has not faced one threat yet. Nobody knows who he is outside of hardcores. Casuals just know him as That Guy That Hit Amir Khan With A Low Blow.

Spence-Crawford are closer in drawing power than Joshua-Wilder. Saying Wilder deserves 50% but Crawford does not is tarded bias.

[_Rexy_]

Man you REALLY hate Crawford for stopping Horn.

[Outwest Exp 355]

Spence-Crawford are closer in drawing power than Joshua-Wilder. Saying Wilder deserves 50% but Crawford does not is tarded bias.

Who’s saying Wilder deserves 50%? 50% of the American revenue I can see but not the total revenue. Joshua should be getting 60 to 65% of the British PPV. And as you know I’m a Wilder fan but what’s fair is fair.

[Combat Talk Radio]

Man you REALLY hate Crawford for stopping Horn.

I hate the ref for an early stoppage. I don't hate Crawford's hustle. Delay the fight, claim a phony hand injury, forces the venue and date to change, afraid to fight in Australia (at least Manny was brave enough to go over there for his ass whooping), throws Horn's camp off. It's brilliant.

"At the end of the day" though, Terence Crawford needs to have his ducking acknowledged.