Pacquiao was never Lineal at welterweight, stop the bs

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Fists_of_Fury
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Feb 2006
    • 7366
    • 2,351
    • 12,608
    • 58,085

    #1

    Pacquiao was never Lineal at welterweight, stop the bs

    Pacquiao LOST to Floyd, the Lineal champion. Floyd retired. Pacquiao never beat the consensus #1 or #2 at welterweight while he was #1 or #2. Tim Bradley was never consensus #1 or #2. Stop with the bull****. Pacquiao is an amazing ATG that accomplished a lot. But he was NEVER Lineal at welterweight. He still could end up Lineal though.
  • Santa_
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Mar 2015
    • 14674
    • 1,417
    • 378
    • 143,233

    #2

    Comment

    • daggum
      All time great
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Feb 2008
      • 43345
      • 4,516
      • 3
      • 166,270

      #3
      he will never be as good as baldomir

      Comment

      • Fists_of_Fury
        Banned
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Feb 2006
        • 7366
        • 2,351
        • 12,608
        • 58,085

        #4
        Originally posted by daggum
        he will never be as good as baldomir
        Judah was Undisputed and Lineal at welterweight. It doesn't mean Zab or Baldomir were necessarily better than Manny or could beat him but they were actually Lineal, unlike Manny.

        Comment

        • Thraxox
          Banned
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Sep 2016
          • 9363
          • 339
          • 56
          • 112,604

          #5
          Manny became the Lineal Welterweight because he won it vs Bradley.

          Comment

          • Fists_of_Fury
            Banned
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Feb 2006
            • 7366
            • 2,351
            • 12,608
            • 58,085

            #6
            Originally posted by Thraxox
            Manny became the Lineal Welterweight because he won it vs Bradley.
            False. Bradley was never consensus #1 or #2 at welterweight. Keith Thurman was ranked higher.

            Comment

            • Thraxox
              Banned
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Sep 2016
              • 9363
              • 339
              • 56
              • 112,604

              #7
              Originally posted by Fists_of_Fury
              False. Bradley was never consensus #1 or #2 at welterweight. Keith Thurman was ranked higher.
              Nah, here's why. "Pacquiao and Bradley entered the bout rated as the top two welterweights by the Transnational Boxing Rankings Board and ESPN (though not Ring Magazine"
              by Cliff Rold - He might not be a young man anymore but he’s still got plenty of greatness left in him. Scoring two knockdowns along the way, 37-year old Man

              Comment

              • Fists_of_Fury
                Banned
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Feb 2006
                • 7366
                • 2,351
                • 12,608
                • 58,085

                #8
                Originally posted by Thraxox
                Nah, here's why. "Pacquiao and Bradley entered the bout rated as the top two welterweights by the Transnational Boxing Rankings Board and ESPN (though not Ring Magazine"
                https://www.boxingscene.com/manny-pa...rilogy--103294
                So they weren't the consensus #1 and #2... thanks for making my point

                Comment

                • Thuglife Nelo
                  Banned
                  • Dec 2018
                  • 26836
                  • 1,299
                  • 1,822
                  • 654,176

                  #9
                  Yeah i don’t get it either. Bradley fought less difficult and non seasoned Welterweights to be considered highs than Thurman. Keith got rid of Diego Chaves while Bradley was playing around with Chavez along with Brandon Rios....

                  Thurman for years always wanted the Floyd and PAC fight. He was notorious in interviews that he deserved the shot with Pac or Floyd. The WBA Regular since Chaves must have meant something...

                  Comment

                  • pacphobia
                    Interim Champion
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Dec 2015
                    • 511
                    • 50
                    • 3
                    • 27,995

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Fists_of_Fury
                    Pacquiao LOST to Floyd, the Lineal champion. Floyd retired. Pacquiao never beat the consensus #1 or #2 at welterweight while he was #1 or #2. Tim Bradley was never consensus #1 or #2. Stop with the bull****. Pacquiao is an amazing ATG that accomplished a lot. But he was NEVER Lineal at welterweight. He still could end up Lineal though.
                    http://www.cyberboxingzone.com/boxing/pastchp.htm explore it yourself

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP