if spence fights pac or someone else good next....

[Curt Henning]

does he owe crawford an immediate fight after that in 2020?

im sure i know the answer from some of you...a resounding "yes"...or "yeah if doesnt hes ducking crawford"....

but those same people have told us that "no guy takes back to back tough fights anymore" when defending golovkin and others....

so would you expect spence to have taken on porter, pac and then crawford all in a row?

while crawford has likely taken back to back no hopers(i think its safe to assume unless hes fighting porter next his next fight will be a dud)

[ShaneMosleySr]

The Crawford fight is overdue and it should happen ASAP. I don’t really care if it’s immediately after a Pacquiao fight but it should be soon.

Also, Golovkin does fight tough fights back to back. He fought Canelo Alvarez immediately after fighting Danny Jacobs and was scheduled to fight Canelo again in an immediate rematch but Canelo failed a drug test.

[Curt Henning]

The Crawford fight is overdue and it should happen ASAP. I don’t really care if it’s immediately after a Pacquiao fight but it should be soon.

Also, Golovkin does fight tough fights back to back. He fought Canelo Alvarez immediately after fighting Danny Jacobs and was scheduled to fight Canelo again in an immediate rematch but Canelo failed a drug test.

and pac/porter would be tough back to back fights

dont change the story...you know damn well, maybe not you personally, but many others have excused his bum fights by using the exact line i stated......

golovkin took on jacobs before canelo because hbo and canelo basically forced him too...given the chance, if he had known he had canelo next for sure, he wouldnt have.....it was demanded he fight someone worth a crap first

[ShaneMosleySr]

They would be tough back-to-back fights and I never implied they wouldn’t be.

I also love how you hate GGG so much that when he does something worth crediting, you instead give credit elsewhere just to dismiss him. Its hilarious.

and pac/porter would be tough back to back fights

dont change the story...you know damn well, maybe not you personally, but many others have excused his bum fights by using the exact line i stated......

golovkin took on jacobs before canelo because hbo and canelo basically forced him too...given the chance, if he had known he had canelo next for sure, he wouldnt have.....it was demanded he fight someone worth a crap first

[Curt Henning]

They would be tough back-to-back fights and I never implied they wouldn’t be.

I also love how you hate GGG so much that when he does something worth crediting, you instead give credit elsewhere just to dismiss him. Its hilarious.

lets be honest...he fought jacobs because hbo and canelo made him....i think most realize that....

sure hes was willing to fight canelo back to back but who wouldnt for the money?

his fans have excuses the vanes, rolls, his next fight by saying "guys dont take tough back to backs..its natural"

the same guys would be the ones crying if spence fought someone real good next and then didnt fight crawford right after that

im asking if its ok for spence to wait till 2021 if he fights pac or someone else real good next....most of them seem real quiet about it now

btw cong**** on golovkin being 37 and having something in his career "worth crediting"....took him long enough eh