Originally posted by emceetns
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Amir Khan To Review Options For 2020, Wants Big Fights
Collapse
-
-
Who has he beat in the last few years to get a big fight? He has to earn it and quit relying on his name, which has become a joke punchline lately.
Comment
-
Big fights.
Hahahahaha.
This guy's biggest claims to fame is who knocked him out.
Who gives a ****?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nusky View PostI've s--tted on Khan alot throughout the years, mainly for ducking Brook(I knew we'd never get that fight)along with his delusional statements. But if you look at his resume he's taken more risks than most of these fighters have. Sure, He's been KO'd a few times and he quit against Crawford but at least he's fought some of the best. And his fights are never boring.
You know who else has taken risks? Broner.
Broner got beat by Maidana, by Garcia, by Manny
At least he fought big names, right?
We are now celebrating spectacular losses just because we idolize our guys. What a sad state of affairs we’ve become
Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by theface07 View PostYou're right but it's probably the only fight that makes sense for both fighters at this point in their careers. They are no longer top contenders but there is still mild interest in them fighting in the UK. They should take that opportunity before one of them becomes more shop worn than they already are.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oregonian View Post———/
You know who else has taken risks? Broner.
Broner got beat by Maidana, by Garcia, by Manny
At least he fought big names, right?
We are now celebrating spectacular losses just because we idolize our guys. What a sad state of affairs we’ve become
I simply pointed out they he has faced better opposition than most of the current so called "top" fighters.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nusky View Post"Celebrating spectacular losses" "idolizing"?...those are pretty strong words. Im gonna pretend you're speaking for yourself and you didn't lump me in with you.
I simply pointed out they he has faced better opposition than most of the current so called "top" fighters.
Yes, I was being sarcastic. You are literally glorifying those losses.
Khan has been reduced to being a journeyman while still in his prime. Journeyman status is typically reserved for aging and past their prime boxers or boxers who get exposed and still get big fights by virtue of name recognition.
Khan is just a sad case. How do you spin something bad and embarrassing into “he’s faced better opposition”?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oregonian View Post—————
Yes, I was being sarcastic. You are literally glorifying those losses.
Khan has been reduced to being a journeyman while still in his prime. Journeyman status is typically reserved for aging and past their prime boxers or boxers who get exposed and still get big fights by virtue of name refcognition.
Khan is just a sad case. How do you spin something bad and embarrassing into “he’s faced better opposition”?
You seen to be the one "spinning". But take it how you want. I don't give a ****
Comment
Comment