If Porter was with Top Rank, PBC fan boys would puke at the idea of Crawford-Porter

[Curt Henning]

they wanna see pac/crawford now...lol.....i love it...thats great....TR had them both and wouldnt make the fight....now these guys are all hard to see pac/crawford...why? because pac isnt being offered...lol

[lolpz]

There aren’t seven elite welterweights. That goes against the definition of elite.

Porter has a better resume AND wins then Crawford.

Name me Crawford’s best wins and lets compare it to Porter’s.

You cannot argue facts.

[Curt Henning]

these guys all know what/who porter is...id be willing to bet if you went back some of them were saying "why doesnt porter come fight crawford at least"....now that porter said he could make a fight theyre doing everything they can to downplay him as an opponent

[thabanga510]

I don't even know why Pacquiao is mentioned. Bob said he stopped that fight from happening because he didn't want Pac to get hurt. Pac is even older now why would we want that?

[Curt Henning]

I don't even know why Pacquiao is mentioned. Bob said he stopped that fight from happening because he didn't want Pac to get hurt. Pac is even older now why would we want that?

the pbc haters are only calling for it now because its not being offered....spence is a poos...danny is a poos...pac scared....but porter just isnt worthy because hes the one being offered...thats how these fgts operate

[LetOutTheCage]

Yes.

He lost nine rounds to Brook.

He fought a close fight with Thurman, a guy who lost nine rounds to Manny Pacquiao.

He fought a close fight with Spence, who’s a raging alcoholic.

I also watched him get a gift over Ugas.

Porter is whatever. He might be the 12th best welterweight in the world right now. Who gives a f**k if he fights Crawford?

He didnt lose 9 rounds to Brook, your talking absolute rubbish. All the losses were close and arguable whether he actually lost
I find it funny how you played down these fighters who are or were considered the top guys in the division at some point

[The Big Dunn]

“I imagine 35 years ago you'd be mad at Leonard/Duran because it wasn't Leonard/Hearns.“

There is no way you think that is comparing Porter to Duran. Stop being fake.

The post is about you and how silly it is for you to whine about a fight because it isn’t the one you want.

You would’ve complained about Leonard/ Duran because it wasn’t the Leonard/ hearns unification.

That is how unreasonable your anti pbc hate threads have become.

Now tell us why? You keep avoiding answering that question.

[ShaneMosleySr]

Viktor Postol is as good as Danny Garcia.

So that settles that.

Porter has a better resume AND wins then Crawford.

Name me Crawford’s best wins and lets compare it to Porter’s.

You cannot argue facts.

[ShaneMosleySr]

Max DeLuca agrees with me.

He didnt lose 9 rounds to Brook, your talking absolute rubbish. All the losses were close and arguable whether he actually lost
I find it funny how you played down these fighters who are or were considered the top guys in the division at some point

[just the facts]

Porter would get called a can and it would be pointed out that he lost to Brook, Spence and Thurman.

But he's with their favorite manager so Crawford-Porter is a must now.

Disgusting.

Yet another ignorant thread started by a douche bag