If Porter was with Top Rank, PBC fan boys would puke at the idea of Crawford-Porter
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
I don’t have an agenda, you have an agenda!
I’m arguing for a welterweight unification. You’re arguing for Crawford to fight as many PBC losers as possible to benefit their brand.
I argue against idiot fan boys. The British accuse me of loving PBC, Canelo fans accuse me of loving Golovkin, etc. etc.
Sorry I want Crawford to fight Spence and Pacquiao, which would be some of the biggest fights in boxing and don’t think he should fight Shawn Porter who lost every big fight he’s ever had.
I’m such an a$$hole for that!
I didn't call you an a$$hole so stop projecting. Wanting Crawford to fight Spence and Manny is fine. Blaming that solely on PBC when the facts show otherwise is the issue I am posting about.
Porter may have lost every big fight but he is still a top 5 WW and better than any WW Crawford has fought. There is no rational reason why would you have an issue with that fight.
Top Rank blocked the Manny/Crawford fight when they were both under their umbrella. Why are you killing PBC for this?
I can understand being frustrated about not getting the exact fight you want. That stated, it is childish to be upset when you might get a damn good fight instead.
I imagine 35 years ago you'd be mad at Leonard/Duran because it wasn't Leonard/Hearns.Comment
-
I get being frustrated that so many fights don't happen. That stated, if you enjoy the sport, sometimes we get really enjoyable fights instead. Since when is a really good fight a bad thing?Comment
-
Comment
-
The fact that he compared Porter to Postol says it all about his agendaComment
-
Comment
-
Comment
Comment