Originally posted by SuperSuperLeeds
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Joshua: We Unified in 20 Fights, Wilder Has Not in 40 - Why Not?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by SuperSuperLeeds View PostAJ is just slightly below wilder and fury, wilder is just slightly below fury. That's how I see. Fury top for klitschko win and wilder win/draw off of inactivity. Wilder 2nd due to longest reigning champion, prestigious WBC and string of fringe contenders and dangerous contender Ortiz all blitzed. And only man to put a serious dent in the enigma and current lineal champ and no.1 Tyson fury. Both fury and wilder have faced a fellow top 3, one of the big 3(eachother). AJ third due to having taken an L and not facing a fellow big 3. But his string of decent contenders that he's beaten and belts he holds puts him above the rest by miles and close to the top two who are near inseparable. But all 3 have arguable claims to supremacy, there near to eachother. I just understand what wlad and his reign meant and the weight of Tysons vicyory in dusseldorf and the magnitude of that is way above what either of the other two have done..quality over quantity.
Comment
-
Because Wilder bet on himself, DUH!
If Wilder bets on himself two more years the offer he gets for unification will be 2 billion dollars!
TIL THIS DAY!
Now I’m finna funna gunna thank Al Haymon TIL THIS DAY!
Wakanda Forevaaaaa!
Comment
-
AJ and Hearn came over here to conquer America, throwing money around, acting like royalty. They came here looking for a fat guy, so AJ could look good and Andy looked like the softest, but Andy knocked AJ out and now AJ wants to conquer the Congo. Thats like shooting for the back fence after you missed the moon.
Comment
-
Originally posted by thabanga510 View PostWell Parker and Martin chose to fight Joshua over Wilder. They wanted no smoke with that right hand.
Only risk takers take the glory.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by SuperSuperLeeds View PostI call it a champion fighting for vacant titles against a contender. And that's what it is. Why do u want to water down what a true unification is? I hear your point i really do but its just weak. Weak sauce. Two real champions now thats a unification. Porter vs Spence of recent recollection. Imagine if porter was beltless and the wbc just agreed to put the title on the line, it would be ripped to shreds if claimed to be a true unification.
You should be president then.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SuperSuperLeeds View PostBut Parker didn't even win the belt! He got a hometown decision like Jeff horn. So he robbed the belt and couldn't even beat hughie fury clearly. He defended the belt (the ****test of all the belts the WBO) against trash opppnents over in OZ. Then sold it to AJ. How wasn't he a paper champion? At least stiverne knocked the **** out of Chris Arreola, a better Arreola, Arreola who would probably take Parker 12 this day! Arreola went 12 with vitali cmon he's a dangerous man Parker carries no power. He's a runner.
Luis Ortiz knocked the snot out of bryant Jennings, much better victory than when wlad fought him in Jennings previous fight..Ortiz was unanimously recognised as a dangerous top contender and a lot of people picked him to beat wilder in the first fight. So I don't know what you're talking about you must of missed the memo on that one, Tyson fury himself said Ortiz is a boogeyman. We all knew Ortiz, a southpaw , Cuban amateur, decent power, savvy. Trouble for anyone.
And as for furys condition, fury is fury, a great fighter , the lineal heavyweight champion the man who beat the man, he was coming in off of two warm up fights and is dangerous any day of the week especially on Sundays,apparently.
He's top 3 in the world so how can you laugh and mock. AJ has yet to fight one of the fellow big 3 yet you mock wilder for having a great fight with fury. Cmon
I will wait.
Comment
Comment