So I guess we can conclude that Jack was robbed last night.

[_Maxi]

The tv channel made a twitter poll after the fight that had 70% people voting that Jack won the fight, vs 30% of people that voted for Pascal.

We also have our poll here in which only 15% of people gave the victory to Pascal: https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...d.php?t=836810

And here we have proof that the R12 KD from Jack was legit: https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...53&postcount=8

[_Rexy_]

Was a close fight. Can we stop calling everything a ****ing robbery?


of course if you put a poll online, the A side TMT fighter is going to get the nod in a close fight lol

[_Maxi]

Was a close fight. Can we stop calling everything a ****ing robbery?


of course if you put a poll online, the A side TMT fighter is going to get the nod in a close fight lol

What's up with that excuse? the majority on the fight thread also had Jack winning. There's no correlation with Jack being a TMT fighter... this is dumb.

[_Rexy_]

What's up with that excuse? the majority on the fight thread also had Jack winning. There's no correlation with Jack being a TMT fighter... this is dumb.

And I didn't score it, and I was surprised when Pascal won since he was the B side fighter, but again, close fight.


114-112 Jack
114-112 Pascal
114-112 Pascal

All three judges agreed on nine of 12 rounds


Robbery?

[Real King Kong]

A better question is, why was that fight even on tv? Who tf asked for that? Pascal being on the card turned it into ppv in Canada. It was obviously a no brainer not to pay for a mismatch and 2 washed up gate keepers. They could have at least added a good supporting bout to bolster the weak main event.

[CubanGuyNYC]

A fight that close can’t be called a robbery. Bad decision maybe. But I thought it was close enough that a draw might’ve been the outcome.

[_Maxi]

A better question is, why was that fight even on tv? Who tf asked for that? Pascal being on the card turned it into ppv in Canada. It was obviously a no brainer not to pay for a mismatch and 2 washed up gate keepers. They could have at least added a good supporting bout to bolster the weak main event.

The fight was great and the best fight of the night.. have you watched it?

[Redd Foxx]

I think Pascal got (another) gift last night. Jack left enough doubt that I can't say "robbery", but I do feel that 2 of the judges made bad calls.
Letting Pascal do those cheesy flurries at the end of rounds was a mistake on Jack's part. Judges usually aren't fooled by that stuff but apparently a couple of them were last night. Jack should have seen the patterns but he seems to learn slow.

[KTFOKING]

A better question is, why was that fight even on tv? Who tf asked for that? Pascal being on the card turned it into ppv in Canada. It was obviously a no brainer not to pay for a mismatch and 2 washed up gate keepers. They could have at least added a good supporting bout to bolster the weak main event.

Whaat? You're complaining THAT fight was on TV? You do realize that Pascal upset Browne last fight, correct? And you think his next fight wasn't going to be on TV? Seemed like great matchmaking from the start and the fight completely delivered.

[_Rexy_]

A better question is, why was that fight even on tv? Who tf asked for that? Pascal being on the card turned it into ppv in Canada. It was obviously a no brainer not to pay for a mismatch and 2 washed up gate keepers. They could have at least added a good supporting bout to bolster the weak main event.

It was fight of the night, and most people knew it would be going into the fight.

I suggest you watch it.

As for the point of the fight? Was supposed to be Browne/Jack rematch but Pascal beat Marcus Browne