Yes, true statement, thanks for keeping it real...the problem with your scenario, Porter may step up resulting in a terrible beat down by T Crawford, Danny will never step up to T Crawford's level!
When I look at Porter, I expect him to be more like Mike Tyson! He used to fight like that, but he's more cautious now, and I don't think that works to his advantage! If Kenny could bring in someone like Mike to help him, I could see Porter giving Charlo a good run for his money! Shawn needs to watch some Frazier and Tyson fights ASAP...or his career might be over!
N’all forget the distraction...Why isn’t Crawford fighting Porter? Just like I said, standard Top Rank promotion strategy. Pretend to be the boogie man on the back of the guys doing the heavy lifting. This keeps people engaged in their terrible in-house mismatches as we wait for the big fight.
I don’t want to hear anything about TC getting ducked by anyone at PBC after running from a lucrative Porter fight.
Everybody always forgets that part of building the super fight. Manny fought guys Floyd had just fought. It showed how well the two fighters were matched and polarized the world.
TC wants the big fights with out taking any risks. This is tired, Bradley needs to be smacked for real.
I just wish this punk ass bitch coward would just shut the Hell up. He has taken the path of least resistance for most of his entire boxing career against a lot of low risk, cherry picked fights against shopworn, washed up and diminished fighters like: Malignaggi, Rios, Granados, Guerrero, Zab Judah, Salka, Erik Morales 2X, Lamont Peterson and now Ivan Redkach.
Yeah, that was 7 years ago. What about now and besides each time has stepped up his level of opposition at the elite level at 147 he always lose; Thurman, Porter and next Erroll Spence, Jr?
2 close fights. What's with the hate? It stems from somewhere, I can tell.
Not only does Bud not have a loss he doesn’t have any controversial wins. Garcia is lucky he got decisions against Herrera and Peterson. Bud would make easy work of him.
Comment