Is the IBF the only belt that's not doing "super" and "interim" champions?

**mxtali** · 12-19-2019, 02:39 PM

super regular??

**N/A** · 12-19-2019, 03:10 PM

Originally posted by boxing90

Getting out of hand now... just went on espn and seen the WBA has super champions regular champions and "super regular" that's crazy...

Every organization has interim champions. The IBF is the strictest though about the circumstances where they'll allow an interim champion. Off the top of my head, the WBC and IBF have one interim champion each right now. The WBO has zero. I think the WBA has six?

The WBA has super champions and world champions. They don't have regular champions or super regular champions.

**Mister Wolf** · 12-19-2019, 03:14 PM

If the IBF will strip Alvarez then they will strip anyone. The current version of them is the most respectable organization.

**MulaKO** · 12-19-2019, 03:20 PM

Originally posted by Mister Wolf

If the IBF will strip Alvarez then they will strip anyone. The current version of them is the most respectable organization.

Your absolutely right
Kind of hard to believe

**ShaneMosleySr** · 12-19-2019, 03:26 PM

The ABC belts suck but the IBF is the most credible at this point.

**KingHippo** · 12-19-2019, 05:30 PM

Originally posted by Mister Wolf

If the IBF will strip Alvarez then they will strip anyone. The current version of them is the most respectable organization.

They are and always will be. People like to laugh at the rankings, not understanding that many don't want to face the obligations (strict mandatories, rehydration rules).

**The D3vil** · 12-19-2019, 07:43 PM

IBF is somehow the only semi competent organization.

Is the IBF the only belt that's not doing "super" and "interim" champions?