Is AJ a hypocrite? (Vid inside)

[W1LL]

View this post on Instagram

If Applejacks and eddiehearn ain’t the biggest hypocrites in boxing I guest there no such thing as Hell this mofo RAN LIKE BIT$&& lmfao. One of the many bipolar interviews from the sweet and low DUO FU&@ boy DONT RUN casanova2x

A post shared by JARRELL BIGBABY MILLER (@bigbabymiller) on Dec 8, 2019 at 11:14am PST

Can some AJ nuthuggers explain this to me? "Fury is trash for boxing/running against Klitschko." Words from AJ's own mouth... you will never see him boxing and running apparently. Except, we just did against Andy Ruiz...

[Robbie Barrett]

A fury fan calling another fighter a hypocrite?

Fury flip flops and makes himself a hypocrite constantly.

[W1LL]

A fury fan calling another fighter a hypocrite?

Fury flip flops and makes himself a hypocrite constantly.

Can you stick to the topic at hand? What do you make of AJ saying boxing and running is cowardly and he'd never do it?

[Robbie Barrett]

Can you stick to the topic at hand? What do you make of AJ saying boxing and running is cowardly and he'd never do it?

Where did he say it was cowardly?

[W1LL]

Where did he say it was cowardly?

"Fury stole the belts, he just boxed and moved. When you come to slay the King, you look him in his face and take what is his."

I know you may be autistic Robbie, but surely you get what AJ is implying here? He is implying that Fury's win was in some way diminished because he "ran" and "stole" it. He is clearly implying Fury won in a cowardly way, and according to AJ, you would never catch him doing that himself. He is a true warrior who would never run and to a decision, would never steal the belts from the champion. Except that is exactly what he just did.

[Articulateboxin]

He is a hypocrite with hindsight, but not in the context of this interview. If he had went out and fought his next fight after this interview, like he did in the Ruiz fight - then yes it would have been. However something happened to change his mind and his stance, i'm sure he would be the first to admit this.

People forget that fury didn't always use to fight on the backfoot, it wasn't until he got chinned a couple of times himself and went life and death with domestic level opponents that he decided to change it up.

[Robbie Barrett]

"Fury stole the belts, he just boxed and moved. When you come to slay the King, you look him in his face and take what is his."

I know you may be autistic Robbie, but surely you get what AJ is implying here? He is implying that Fury's win was in some way diminished because he "ran" and "stole" it. He is clearly implying Fury won in a cowardly way, and according to AJ, you would never catch him doing that himself. He is a true warrior who would never run and to a decision, would never steal the belts from the champion. Except that is exactly what he just did.

So he didn't say it was cowardly. YOU interpret that way.

Fury was way more defensive against Wlad than Joshua was against Ruiz too. So can't even compare them.

[Marchegiano]

Well, yeah, of course. All businessmen are.

[W1LL]

So he didn't say it was cowardly. YOU interpret that way.

Fury was way more defensive against Wlad than Joshua was against Ruiz too. So can't even compare them.

Fury: 86 of 371 (23%), 48 power punches
AJ: 107 of 373 (29%), 42 power punches

Not THAT much difference in activity Robbie, with Fury fighting a long-reigning, Legendary opponent.

[Robbie Barrett]

Fury: 86 of 371 (23%), 48 power punches
AJ: 107 of 373 (29%), 42 power punches

Not THAT much difference in activity Robbie, with Fury fighting a long-reigning, Legendary opponent.

You think compubox means anything? Watch the fights.

Lets also not forget that Joshua did fight Klitschko and did go toe to toe with him.