Can someone explain to me why wilder is allowed to get away with ducking whyte?

[D4thincarnation]

Al Haymon.

Wilder has huge flaws in his style, a quality boxer find them and beat Wilder.

Haymon match's up Wilder very well, he wants to milk him for all he is worth.

Haymon is also a powerful figure in boxing and has pulled strings to keep Wilder away from Whyte.

[Diddly Shyte]

Foken chickenlegs!

[LetOutTheCage]

LMAO! Now, Josh Katzowitz, writer for Forbes, is misrepresenting what Hearn said. There is a video referenced in the article. If you would like to watch it and correct Mr Katzowitz, feel free to. Otherwise, I've submitted my evidence and the burden is upon you to refute it.

Good luck...

Ok...so at roughly the 30 second mark of the video, Hearn says "Wilder fights Dillian Whyte, and the winner fights Josh"

That's called an OFFER, the fact that u cant seem to understand this is staggering. There are YouTube interviews in which Hearn has explicitly said Wilder DOES NOT have to fight Whyte first to get to AJ.

The fact that you continue to ignore this along with the other offers (including the 2-3 fight deal is embarrassing). Keep digging your whole though so the rest of us can keep laughing

[hhh1200]

PBC hasn't recouped its' investment in Wilder. Youth and bodywork give Whyte a legit chance to beat Wilder. Fury will just dance around the ring, so it's easy to rig the cards again for a drawer or Wilder robbery. Haymon gets his money back before anyone gets that belt off of Wilder.

[Ray*]

That's the point I was trying to make while you were saying Hearn was talking about a Parker fight.

I really don't understand the complexity here. Hearn said, "Wilder Fights Whyte, the winner gets Josh."

What's not to understand

Nope, thats your interpretation. Which is pure lies.

[Curtis Harper]

Being that the present HW is a wasteland, it makes perfect sense a scrub like Whyte is supposed to be a threat.

[GGG Gloveking]

That's called an OFFER

Yeah, it's an offer to fight Whyte as an eliminator for AJ.

The fact that he later changed his stance in no way alters the very clear, concise, and plain language of "Wilder fights Dillian Whyte...and the winner fights Josh."

There is zero ambiguity in that statement.

[GGG Gloveking]

Nope, thats your interpretation. Which is pure lies.

What exactly is your interpretation of "Wilder will fight Dillian Whyte...and the winner fights Josh."

[LetOutTheCage]

Yeah, it's an offer

This is all that needs to be said, it's an offer not a blocker like you and one or two other people have been trying to argue very unsuccessfully

[LetOutTheCage]

Nope, thats your interpretation. Which is pure lies.

He cant tell the difference between someone making an offer and someone saying you have to fight "person A to get to person B".

He also cant seem to understand that an Article that mentions Hearn and the offer is not the same as Hearn himself commenting.

There are many interviews on YouTube in which Hearn addressed this matter clearly but these guys are purposely choosing to ignore this