Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Crawford: I'm "1" at 147 - I Beat The Man Who Beat The Man!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by rckdees View Post
    If this clown thinks beating Jeff Horn make him #1 I see a rehab in his future....idiot
    Originally posted by Gary Coleman View Post
    ???

    Beating Jeff Horn makes Crawford #1.

    Where do you people come from?
    Notice: Immediately after Horn beat Manny, 99% of NSB said the win doesn't count because Horn got a gift/robbery and Manny was washed up/past prime/over the hill.

    Yet after Crawford beats Horn and Manny beat three other guys (meaning he was NOT washed up), not only does Crawford hang his hat on Horn as a signature win, now you got NSB cats flip flopping talking about it as the win that makes him #1 at 147 because Horn beat Manny - and all of a sudden they rate the win. ONLY because Crawford beat Horn.

    I'm serious. You can't make up this hypocrisy.

    Comment


    • #42
      Terence Crawford is lineal champion using Tyson Fury lineal championship rules.

      Pacquiao won the lineal championship after defeating Tim Bradley in the third fight. He then announced his retirement and his lineal title disappeared.

      But according to Tyson Fury lineal championship rules, you don’t lose the title if you retire. Therefore Pacquiao would have retained his lineal championship until he lost to Jeff Horn.

      Crawford then beat Horn, making Crawford lineal champion through Tyson Fury rules.

      No one really thinks Crawford is lineal champion but if you believe Fury is, then Crawford is as well.

      Comment


      • #43
        He beat the boy who rob the "Man".
        Crawford is class A, but that is bullsh**t.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr View Post
          Terence Crawford is lineal champion using Tyson Fury lineal championship rules.

          Pacquiao won the lineal championship after defeating Tim Bradley in the third fight. He then announced his retirement and his lineal title disappeared.

          But according to Tyson Fury lineal championship rules, you don’t lose the title if you retire. Therefore Pacquiao would have retained his lineal championship until he lost to Jeff Horn.

          Crawford then beat Horn, making Crawford lineal champion through Tyson Fury rules.

          No one really thinks Crawford is lineal champion but if you believe Fury is, then Crawford is as well.
          Pacquiao had even more reason to stay as a lineal champ than Fury. How long was Pacquiao inactive from ‘retirement’? How long was Fury inactive?
          Last edited by Ca$ual Fan; 12-16-2019, 12:00 PM.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by daggum View Post
            and gamboa beat salido who beat loma. real recognize real.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by -Kev- View Post
              “I beat the man who won a controversial decision against the man who wasn’t even the man at that time.”
              I was thinking the same thing.

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by djb914 View Post
                Ironically a few years ago when Floyd Mayweather Jr. was the 147 Pound Champion Everyone wanted a chance to fight the best, Now Crawford is the champ he has a hard time getting people to fight him, What happened to the 147 pound fighters? They no longer want to Fight the best? Yet EVERYONE at 160-175 wants to fight Canelo because most think he is the best.

                Mayweather Jr. was Lucky when he fought at 147 that everyone wanted to fight him, if he had come around a few years later he would have had the same problem Crawford is having with the top guys not wanting to fight him and if Crawford was at 147 a few years ago EVERYONE would be wanting to fight him.

                Classic case of right place at the right time for Mayweather Jr. and wrong place at the wrong time for Crawford.
                its about MONEY...floyd and Canelo brought MONEY!!!! Crawford does not

                Comment


                • #48
                  Beat the man who robbed the man, Terence Crawford is hiding in Top Stank his last outing was dreadful nobody was talking about it on social media. About time TC grew a pair of balls and fought legitimate opponents and stop the cherry picking.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Terence Duckford is becoming a idiot. blame yourself for signing with toprank. you signed the dam contract.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by Vodkaholic View Post
                      Lmao your an idiot. Nowhere in the article does it mention the ring or lineal championship.
                      Its pretty obvious crawford meant Pacquiao is the man because of his star power and resume. Spencer hadnt fought anyone worth a danm, porters best win was malignaggi and garcia was still living off the mathysee win. Smfh your a dumbass.
                      You can’t spin what “the man who beat the man” means. In boxing that phrase has only one meaning.

                      And you keep calling me dumb but you’re the one who doesn’t even know the difference of “your” and “you’re” on top of not knowing anything about boxing. You barely know English.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP