espn has that nerve to call Crawford the “best” lol

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • kidbazooka
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Dec 2015
    • 10062
    • 278
    • 2
    • 133,405

    #1

    espn has that nerve to call Crawford the “best” lol

    It’s sad that that’s what boxing has come down to each network says they have the “best” yet everyone knows Canelo is easily the best p4p today.

    Thats the problem with the sport the media is so biased it’s disgusting Crawford has done jack ****t to be called the best yet they gonwith it because he’s on there network and same for pbc trying to make ppl believe Spence is the “best”.

    If espns only fighter was David Lemieux those lame fucccks would shamelessly proclaim him as the p4p best today smh

    None of these clowns have half the resume Canelo has plain n simple.

    Sad.
    Last edited by kidbazooka; 12-15-2019, 02:41 AM.
  • Thuglife Nelo
    Banned
    • Dec 2018
    • 26836
    • 1,299
    • 1,822
    • 654,176

    #2
    Yeah the guy from ESPN is just playing the part, obvious shill commentator with the scripted agenda. It’s cause guys like Mauro Ranallo from Showtime, whom I think is the best at causing pure excitement, sounds the most honest intuitively, and the guy from ESPN is just copying that energy. Same thing like that Hispanic kat on PBC whom tries hard with his voice as if it’s old school NBC or CBS sports.

    Brian Kenny has matured over the years and in my opinion the best atm. I don’t mind Ward on ESPN. Bradley just sucks off his network’s fighters like some job security script...

    Bernstein and Paulie have become boring imo. That wasn’t supposed to happen.

    Come to think of it, I miss HBO commentary, and that’s not supposed to happen either! Lol

    Comment

    • Jubei
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jun 2009
      • 6678
      • 457
      • 286
      • 56,728

      #3
      Yeah, Loma, Inoue and Usyk are the best, Crawford and Canelo are 4 and 5.

      Comment

      • Thuglife Nelo
        Banned
        • Dec 2018
        • 26836
        • 1,299
        • 1,822
        • 654,176

        #4
        Originally posted by Jubei
        Yeah, Loma, Inoue and Usyk are the best, Crawford and Canelo are 4 and 5.
        Says the guy who was cheerleading those videos of “PAC beat Mayweather in slow motion doe.”

        Comment

        • Articulateboxin
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Oct 2019
          • 1065
          • 54
          • 81
          • 26,809

          #5
          I think Crawford is a great fighter, but until he has his GGG equivalent (Spence), I don't see how anyone but Canelo can be #1. I don't hate Loma being #1 and I think he's a much more entertaining fighter, however again the opposition doesn't feel the same (If Rigo had been a touch younger perhaps)

          Comment

          • Roadblock
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • May 2006
            • 14031
            • 3,536
            • 428
            • 108,713

            #6
            They just selling their stuff, every business does.

            Comment

            • Ray*
              Be safe!!!
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jul 2005
              • 44867
              • 1,654
              • 1,608
              • 558,890

              #7
              Am shocked they aren’t doing worse than that, especially when you look at the behaviours of the other networks.

              Comment

              • kidbazooka
                Banned
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Dec 2015
                • 10062
                • 278
                • 2
                • 133,405

                #8
                Originally posted by Articulateboxin
                I think Crawford is a great fighter, but until he has his GGG equivalent (Spence), I don't see how anyone but Canelo can be #1. I don't hate Loma being #1 and I think he's a much more entertaining fighter, however again the opposition doesn't feel the same (If Rigo had been a touch younger perhaps)
                Exactly

                Canelos resume ****ts on those guys easily

                Comment

                • elfag
                  Alpha fäggot
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jan 2008
                  • 15628
                  • 3,492
                  • 302
                  • 65,929

                  #9
                  Originally posted by kidbazooka
                  It’s sad that that’s what boxing has come down to each network says they have the “best” yet everyone knows Canelo is easily the best p4p today.

                  Thats the problem with the sport the media is so biased it’s disgusting Crawford has done jack ****t to be called the best yet they gonwith it because he’s on there network and same for pbc trying to make ppl believe Spence is the “best”.

                  If espns only fighter was David Lemieux those lame fucccks would shamelessly proclaim him as the p4p best today smh

                  None of these clowns have half the resume Canelo has plain n simple.

                  Sad.


                  noob alert. Its been that way. Since the hbo-showtime days, they act like the other network fighters dont exist. It was super rare for them to even acknowledge the existance of another networks fighters. Let me give you an example since you were obviously in diapers back then, HBO would bring up a graphic saying "lets look at the welterweight landscape" and they would show pictures of all the top HBO welterweights. If there was a show time guy they aint say his name. Got it now noob?

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  TOP