Originally posted by SkiPete
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
I mean damnit, ANOTHER asterisk for Crawford.
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by _Rexy_ View Postwhat's the asterisk over now? We can call it a KD if you like, and make it a 10-8 round on all of our cards.
There, did it make a difference?
But ultimately, my point is that there's been controversy of some kind in every single one of Crawford's wins at 147, no matter how small. Same is not true of Manny. Or Spence.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TyrantT316 View PostHe was never a bum. people just couldn't pronounce his name so they assumed he was a bum. he was a mandatory not necessarily dictated by Crawford.
Only girlish fanboyism for networks and promotional companies.
Get with it, or get left behind!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Gate keeper View PostOnly uninformed casuals were calling him a bum. He's a two time Olympian and ranked top 10 in the world. Let's face it, in this day and age, anyone is not popular is a bum according to some. Just like Lipinets was a bum against Garcia. It's silly
Also can we please stop with this culture of - if one or two people were saying something, then it suddenly means everyone was saying it. That happens here way too often
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mr. Philadel View PostWhat’s the asterisk for?!?
There's dispute whether Crawford got dropped by an underdog; it wasn't counted. That's an asterisk. It's not about the outcome, it's about WHY that happened to him.
Comment
-
Porter beats crawford, Spence def beats him. Hell Danny has a good shot against crawford. This dude is soooo *****ing overhypedddd
Comment
-
Originally posted by revelated View PostWhen there's ANYTHING in dispute during a fight - that's an asterisk.
There's dispute whether Crawford got dropped by an underdog; it wasn't counted. That's an asterisk. It's not about the outcome, it's about WHY that happened to him.
Comment
Comment