I have actually been researching this very topic to determine fighters of the decade in each division. In regards to Tyson Fury, he earned the #1 ranking for 2015 by defeating Wladimir Klitschko and then held it by default in 2016 and 2017 even though he didn't fight during that time (and thus denied Wlad the opportunity to avenge his loss). He finally lost that top spot due to inactivity and AJ was #1 until Ruiz pulled the upset. I scored Wilder-Fury 1 for Fury and his ranking is based on his performances against his biggest threats (Wlad, Wilder) while Joshua's is more of an accumulation of being the best of the rest (Dillian Whyte, Joseph Parker, Alexander Povetkin, Andy Ruiz Jr. and possibly Kubrat Pulev next). In summary, it looks like the Ring magazine ratings value beating the number 1 guy over running through the rest of the top 10. That, like anything else, is subjective.
Tyson Fury #1 Heavyweight Ring Magazine
Collapse
-
When wasn't it a propaganda publication?Ring Magazine is owned by Golden Boy Promotions. The ratings committee publicly confirmed that Golden Boy interfered in the ratings. The ratings committee quit in disgust and founded TBRB so Golden Boy couldn't interfere.
Why would anyone in their right mind continue to recognize Ring Magazine after a promoter bought it and turned it into a propaganda publication?
Nat Fleischer ranged from a plagiarist to fiction author with little in between. After Nat Ring did nothing to credit original work or set right records they made up. Today TBRB is that Ring's continuation while Oscar has brought in his own flavor of bias and ****ery into real Ring.
Not a big deal really, they're both just a gaggle of bull**** artists.Comment
-
I guess Fury - Klitschko is the biggest heavyweight fight ever.
It has been 4 years since that fight took place. And Fury is still N. 1. Wow.
Fury was a fringe contender before facing Vladimir,, don`t forget that. Nobody thought he even had a chance.Comment
Comment