Foreman, Tyson, have same opinion on Holyfield/ "SMALL HEAVYWEIGHTS" advantage

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Abe Attell
    Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2006
    • 2226
    • 75
    • 0
    • 8,860

    #1

    Foreman, Tyson, have same opinion on Holyfield/ "SMALL HEAVYWEIGHTS" advantage

    I watched the Foreman "Ringside" on ESPN...also, remembering from when Tyson was on Carson Daly's Show (which I would like to state I only watched because they advertised "Tyson" was going to be on}, had a similar opinion on Holyfield: He may not punch really hard, but Punching in Bunches is *****
    Tyson said that even though Holyfield wasn't the hardest of punchers, his ability to continuely attack was troubling...somebody like Lennox Lewis was easier to deal with, even though he punched much harder, because you could brace yourself since you saw the punch {note "punch" is singular} coming.

    Foreman also mentioned about "Small Heavyweights" {during the Joe Louis "Ringside"} that heavyweights like Louis and Ali have an ability to think faster and punch in volume much more than that of a "Bigger" heavyweight because of their experience in fighting in the division below...their size, which is not to big, gives them many advantages.



    Of course, in my opinion, somebody like Holyfield only was able to do what he was able to do because of his incredible HEART and Iron CHIN; the same with Ali...I would like to point out that their skull size were that of a heavyweight so maybe we should forget the rest Actually, if you look at Evander, I always wondered if he could really take a lot of body punches from a true heavyweight; this was not really tested since most heavyweights of today only attack the head...note: though Holyfield wasn't in his prime, Tyson hurt Evander to the body.
    Also, when you look at fighters that move up in weight, a big telling point is if they can take body punches, which most seem not to.


    Not sure where Tyson himself fits into this equation:
    He was one of the fastest heavyweights in history, and the fastest power punching heavyweight in history in my opinion...he could throw in bunches, and move like a middleweight...but, he was already 200lbs by the time he was 13 so not sure if he can be considered on the same lines as Holyfield and Ali.
    Last edited by Abe Attell; 08-01-2006, 03:49 PM.
  • NJFighter91
    #1 P4P Heavyweight
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2006
    • 1706
    • 57
    • 49
    • 8,467

    #2
    Tyson wasn't 200 at 13, that's an over exageration. There was a pic in a video clip at Tyson at 13 and he was more like 150-160 looking like he was 5'9''. Then at 16-17 he looked about 190-200 and as a pro became 210-220.

    Comment

    • Kid Achilles
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Oct 2004
      • 6376
      • 467
      • 354
      • 14,544

      #3
      Tyson was definitely a smaller sized heavyweight. Frame wise he was no bigger than Marciano or Frazier. He had a lot of natural musculature, like Jeff Lacy, but his skeletal structure was small for a heavyweight.

      Where is that pic of Tyson with his arm around Eubank and looking smaller and perhaps even lighter than the natural super middleweight? Clearly he had to have been heavier than Eubank but his relatively small frame has him looking like a sub-heavyweight in that photograph.

      Comment

      • Galindezs
        Banned
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Jan 2006
        • 168
        • 14
        • 0
        • 203

        #4
        Originally posted by Kid Achilles
        Where is that pic of Tyson with his arm around Eubank

        Comment

        • Galindezs
          Banned
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Jan 2006
          • 168
          • 14
          • 0
          • 203

          #5
          Eubank wasn't really a natural SMW though - he would drag every ounce of liquid from his body to make weight before shooting back up in weight again after the weigh-in (fighting at around 180-185, ripped to the bone).

          Plus, Tyson is kind of behind Eubank almost and leaning towards. Eubank closer the camera. (Tyson is 5'11, Eubank 5'10)

          Comment

          • Kid Achilles
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Oct 2004
            • 6376
            • 467
            • 354
            • 14,544

            #6
            Still a 6'+ heavyweight like Louis, Norton, Dempsey, or Ali who worked down to 190-210 pounds as Eubank worked to 168 would have dwarved Eubank. Tyson had the musculature but his skeleton was of a small heavyweight/large cruiserweight.

            Thanks for the pic BTW. How cool would it be to just hang around with either of those guys?

            Comment

            • Galindezs
              Banned
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Jan 2006
              • 168
              • 14
              • 0
              • 203

              #7
              It would be cool to hang with Tyson, man.

              Very strange to hang with Eubank, though, guy is just strange. I think he's ill.

              Comment

              • Crazy Dude
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Jun 2006
                • 644
                • 24
                • 52
                • 7,083

                #8
                what year was the picture taken?

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP