Povetkin is the best out of those, but his career was already derailed by legal/doping issues.
Neither you nor I had Whyte on our radar when that fight was announced. It had to be promoted using their amateur feud. Parker is effectively a failed prospect who fights like a gunshy Pulev (and didn't really beat Ruiz).
I don't really see how those are much different wins than Ortiz or Stiverne (& considering how they were regarded pre-defeat, they might even be significantly superior wins).
In terms of a single win, none compare to ending Wlad's historic reign.
All in all none of their resumes really stand out that much from each other. The big tie breaker? Fury and Wilder will have fought each other twice. That removes joshua from the resume discussion.
Neither you nor I had Whyte on our radar when that fight was announced. It had to be promoted using their amateur feud. Parker is effectively a failed prospect who fights like a gunshy Pulev (and didn't really beat Ruiz).
I don't really see how those are much different wins than Ortiz or Stiverne (& considering how they were regarded pre-defeat, they might even be significantly superior wins).
In terms of a single win, none compare to ending Wlad's historic reign.
All in all none of their resumes really stand out that much from each other. The big tie breaker? Fury and Wilder will have fought each other twice. That removes joshua from the resume discussion.
Yes, you ****ing idiot, Wlad used Am techniques. Not only is it ****ing obvious but even if you are just learning techniques then all you have to do is listen to the mug who trained him to find the same information I just imparted to you, sweetheart.
Comment