Comments Thread For: Whyte Reclaims WBC Interim-Title, In Line For Wilder-Fury Winner
Collapse
-
Comment
-
This Whyte situation reminds me of the Canelo situation. In the sense that despite an adverse finding there is no real punishment.
Promoters, sanctioning bodies and weak testing agencies are ostensibly institutionalising drug cheating in boxing.
It’s a disgraceful look for the sport, but unfortunately money will always rule over integrity.Comment
-
another sad day for boxing, where a proven drugs cheat, is repositioned to mandatory status, smells of ed ***** lining some more pockets at the top once again...someone will die soon in a big televised bout with a proven drug cheat being let to box, it will be to late then for I told you so, ed ***** is tarnishing a once great division, and a once great sport, it really is a shame but corruption is now the norm..........Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
There is no punishment because the levels they found aren't performance-enhancing, the inquiry was just to consider the possibility of him cycling off a larger dose which proved false.
They merely queried why they were there at all but given the level of testing double a Canelo or Wilder he past These tests he did were in addition to the tests Wilder say would undergo (ie he past all the WBC VADA tests, so the WBC couldn't do a lot).
Also if he did fail a WADA UKAD test they usually ban for years, unlike a Miller ban. He never hit illegal levels they just wanted to check he couldn't be cycling what saved him was the frequency of the UKAD and VADA tests.
The facts are D-Bol was in his system which means he at some point ingested it, that’s a violation. There’s always gonna be loopholes, and Whyte’s team were able to exploit them, the same way team Canelo did and the same way countless fighters had.
As I said in my OP, cheating is being institutionalised.Comment
Comment