Comments Thread For: Anthony Joshua: Version 2.0
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Well I'm strictly referring to his boxing technique, which imo is extra fine and pleasant to look at, while aj is "just" an incredibly gifted and fit athlete who would probably do VERY good in most sports, especially track&field ones.Comment
-
Cong****, that was the dumbest comment of the week so far hahahah. Or possibly the gayest??Comment
-
Well, happy to make you laught. Usually this happens when someone doesn't know how to argue.
Fury is a great boxer, AJ is a top athlete who boxes. These are very different things.
Larry Holmes at 53 was able to beat Eric Esch on points. Ruiz is now very similar to Esch.Comment
-
I agree it was a stinker but it smelled like roses compared to Fury's rotten snoozer vs Wlad"It wasn’t pretty"
This. It was the most annoying performance in a hw title match I've ever witnessed. Never been a fan of Joshua (I much prefer Tyson Fury and, somehow, even Wilder) but after this I think even more that he's only interested in money (so he HAD to win, whatever that strategy could have been).Comment
-
A great boxer, doesn't have to survive against Wallin hahahahaWell, happy to make you laught. Usually this happens when someone doesn't know how to argue.
Fury is a great boxer, AJ is a top athlete who boxes. These are very different things.
Larry Holmes at 53 was able to beat Eric Esch on points. Ruiz is now very similar to Esch.Comment
-
Is the article writer on the AJ payroll? The fawning is pretty bad.From the outside with his jab,he was pretty good,but when he exchanged inside he looked vulnerable.Even his grabbing was not that effective.He may have won back his titles,but he's clearly no.3 as a heavyweight behind Fury and Wilder.He's on borrowed time.Comment
-
OK, and now share your thoughts on Dillian Whyte vis-a-vis a potential rematch with AJ early on this year, with terms that he described as "utterly ridiculous"Comment
Comment