Rahman-Maskaev: Pay-Per-View Worthy?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • LiLHopkins
    The King of Uploads
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2006
    • 3827
    • 185
    • 132
    • 10,755

    #11
    Should have put James Toney vs. Hasim Rahman on PPV. If the fight is exciting as Lamon Brewster vs. Serguei Lyakhovich then I would take back what I said about it.

    Comment

    • Hitman932
      I LOVE Euro Fighters!!
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jul 2005
      • 14910
      • 1,180
      • 836
      • 28,259

      #12
      wlad vs peter - free
      wlad vs byrd - free
      wlad vs briggs - free


      rahman vs barrett - ppv
      rahman vs maskaev - ppv
      valuev vs whoever - ppv
      lyakovich vs brewster and mcbride - ppv

      what am i missing here?

      Comment

      • Boxing4Real
        Don Omega
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Jul 2006
        • 365
        • 131
        • 22
        • 6,739

        #13
        king is an idiot. so is arum. dibella too. csi also. they put on some horrible ass PPVs that should be network cards. although I hold the networks responsible too because some cards they refuse to show, willing to show NOTHING over those cards. disgrace, especially seeing some of the **** they have put on. and i'm not talking just boxing matches, movies too. Rome? LMAO get real.

        Comment

        • Big R
          Banned
          • Feb 2006
          • 27
          • 14
          • 8
          • 60

          #14
          well after seeing the first fight for the first time the other night i think it is even though its alot of years later and it probably wont be as good as the first but im intersted but dont know if i wanna pay 50 bucks for it

          Comment

          • BIGTYME
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jul 2006
            • 1080
            • 92
            • 129
            • 1,303

            #15
            Originally posted by Hitman932
            wlad vs peter - free
            wlad vs byrd - free
            wlad vs briggs - free


            rahman vs barrett - ppv
            rahman vs maskaev - ppv
            valuev vs whoever - ppv
            lyakovich vs brewster and mcbride - ppv

            what am i missing here?
            tru

            nope its not a good ppv fight but i order all of them and this 1 will be ordered also!

            Comment

            • the_truth_1984
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Feb 2006
              • 683
              • 14
              • 0
              • 6,990

              #16
              No way this should be on ppv.Of course they also put Vitali Klitschko vs. Danny Williams on ppv and that looked like a mismatch on paper.Sometimes HBO just makes dumb moves and this is one.

              Comment

              • guru
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jul 2004
                • 2800
                • 69
                • 0
                • 8,993

                #17
                Rahman-Maskaev: Pay-Per-View Worthy?


                F-U-C-K N-O

                Comment

                • Nautilus
                  ...
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Apr 2004
                  • 6083
                  • 402
                  • 761
                  • 13,468

                  #18
                  Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP
                  My, how far the heavyweight division has fallen. Of course this is not news to followers of the sport but even diehard fans have got to be scratching their heads over the August 12th rematch between current WBC belt holder Hasim Rahman and challenger Oleg Maskaev. It’s not so much the match up itself, as questionable as it is, but the fact that HBO and promoter Bob Arum are asking boxing fans to shell out $49.95 for a fight that isn’t even worthy of HBO’s After Dark program.

                  This is the network whose talking heads (Larry Merchant and Jim Lampley) constantly deride sanctioning bodies, preferring to recognize Ring Magazine’s title belt holder as the king of the division. So why is this bout on pay per view? The only answer is, it’s a “championship” fight.

                  Are you kidding me? [details]

                  It is overpriced, should be about 20$, but I will still buy the PPV.

                  Comment

                  • spinksjinx
                    Promiscuous Protestah
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • May 2004
                    • 6029
                    • 339
                    • 434
                    • 12,900

                    #19
                    I am completely thrilled they put this fight on PPV. I dont want to watch it, have no intentions of watching it and I dont have to waste my Saturday night like I would if it was on regular HBO.

                    I applaud them for putting the crappy fights on ppv. I know it sounds a bit weird, but still...


                    Also Maskaev vs Rahman could be a pretty decent fight, Maskaev is an agressive heavyweight and we could see some heavy blows being thrown....

                    This fight belongs on a Don King heavyweight cards since those are known for crap.

                    Comment

                    • PBDS
                      RIP D
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jul 2004
                      • 20408
                      • 1,763
                      • 4,645
                      • 33,018

                      #20
                      ....Absoutely not PPV worthy IMO.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP