I'm really glad you mentioned that. It's not something a lot of fans will realize from the outset if they're just getting into history but Bio book are kinda more propaganda than history
Matt was lucky to get me to read Peter Maher. I was actually researching CC Smith when Matt told me his book has a page on Smith. Being as it was my only jumping off point for CC I picked up the book for reference material, but, Dunnellon really went out of his way to write about Peter and everyone around Peter. So that one's actually a good history book combined with your more run of the mill bio glorification stuff.
Outside of that, yeah, a bio book you read just to read a whole lot of ass kissing. They always do things like gloss over 3 losses in a row in a few lines then go on for a page and a half about how great some random KO was over some no body.
Great post bud, thanks for pointing that out.
Matt was lucky to get me to read Peter Maher. I was actually researching CC Smith when Matt told me his book has a page on Smith. Being as it was my only jumping off point for CC I picked up the book for reference material, but, Dunnellon really went out of his way to write about Peter and everyone around Peter. So that one's actually a good history book combined with your more run of the mill bio glorification stuff.
Outside of that, yeah, a bio book you read just to read a whole lot of ass kissing. They always do things like gloss over 3 losses in a row in a few lines then go on for a page and a half about how great some random KO was over some no body.
Great post bud, thanks for pointing that out.
Comment