Why does everybody think a b sample is needed where is this information from.. the hearing and exonorating happened before the Rivas fight, no b sample is necessary. What we need is an explanation from UKAD and white as to how he talked himself our of that hearing and explained the adverse findings. An explanation of what exactly was the adverse findings and the ppm..there should be an official report by UKAD and an I'm depth statement from team whyte to put this to bed. If the b sample came back with the same adverse findings as his initial sample(which they allowed him to fight with) then nothing is proven or disproven. Whyte hasn't denied the findings why would he request the b sample?
At least the Whyte card is being taken to ****ing Saudi Arabia to get around shenanigans. If Nevada extends the suspension, Arizona wont license him. Still this is all a joke.
Comment