I disagree. I feel when the defendants sold their product, to wit, the PPV event, there was an implied warranty of fitness attached. This implied warranty was breached by Mr. Pacquiao, by his knowing and willful failure to disclose his adverse condition.
Of course, if you read, you'll see the real reason they don't want the case to proceed: fear of the precedent they'd establish and potential future lawsuits.
Of course, if you read, you'll see the real reason they don't want the case to proceed: fear of the precedent they'd establish and potential future lawsuits.
Comment