DAZN paying off the media?

[DaNeutral.]

Interesting. you want men that give pro dazn opinions to have their opinions respected, but label everyone that says something positive about PBC as "cultists".

I have no problem with anybody saying anything positive about the PBC as long as its not lies. I have no problem with anything negative about DAZN, aslong as its not lies. And id like a bit less racism from you if thats possible.

[The Big Dunn]

I have no problem with anybody saying anything positive about the PBC as long as its not lies. I have no problem with anything negative about DAZN, aslong as its not lies. And id like a bit less racism from you if thats possible.

That is an absolute lie. Anyone that posts anything positive about PBC you label them cultists and imply they are only saying something positive about PBC because they are black.

You just did that with poster baroidi.

You have no idea why rummy posted what he did.

Pointing out your race related BS isn't racism on my part. When you stop the race baiting and racist posts, I will have nothing to say to you.

[DaNeutral.]

That is an absolute lie. Anyone that posts anything positive about PBC you label them cultists and imply they are only saying something positive about PBC because they are black.

You just did that with poster baroidi.

You have no idea why rummy posted what he did.

Pointing out your race related BS isn't racism on my part. When you stop the race baiting and racist posts, I will have nothing to say to you.

What would be my purpose of race baiting?

[KillaMane26]

I cant lie im wondering are you getting paid...cant see any reasonable poster going all out for a damn promotional company without getting paid

all this promotional beef is weak,suspect and ******

Facts. It wasnt like this when i first joined. Idk wtf going on around here these days

[Inspired]

Actually I was referring specifically to the part where he mentions 'paid stories, posts' on websites - included presumably forums like this one. As to the rest, sure... there's plenty of overt stuff, news and the suchlike, but also a slighly less obvious - or at least direct - social media battle going on the build or harm confidence in the competing brands. Least, that's the way I see it.

The relationship between DAZN promoter of choice, Matchroom’s Eddie Hearn and London-based YouTube boxing channel IFL looks especially troubling under a microscope. IFL co-founder Kugan Cassius is sponsored by MTK Global—a management company that represents fighters doing business with Hearn. So, essentially, one business partner is interviewing another and it’s being passed off as news content. According to several media members contacted for this article, IFL receives unprecedented access to events and is even allowed to film in areas off limits to video recording by other media outlets.

But this kind of relationship between media and DAZN seems shockingly standard procedure.

“[It] begs the question, are you media or do you work for them?” said the media insider.


1) mtk global manage Tyson Fury and BJS and a number of others across promotions.
IFL are also sponsored by Frank Warren.

so really what this article states is an attempt to give matchroom a reputation of trying to monopolise the sport.

'mtk global work with matchroom'
they also work with anyone else inc top rank.



2)
the reason why ifl are given preferential treatment by matchroom is because they're professionals with solid numbers on youtube and an established relationship. take for example the big titted mexican girl...she isnt friends with eddie hearn, yet she is professional and friendly. She's likeable basically and has an established relationship with eddie (in the interviewing context lol).

basically if you're a respected face in the youtube boxing media world and matchroom have done interviews with you, you're going to be given preferential treatment by matchroom. They really court everyone. Remember Eddie's done enough interviews with the ldbc guys. However those guys are bad energy too, so he tends to toy with them.
with the ksi vs logan paul fight, these channels made money from all those extra views. that was more like a reward for conducting themselves the right way.
The ones who didnt get access, as obv not liked by Eddie hearn...

it seems they're bitter they didnt get access to the ksi vs logan paul event.


3) you only have to watch ifl on youtube to know they are far easier with frank warren and bob arum than they are with eddie...owing to eddie's age and manner of handling criticism. criticise bob arum or frank and they will probably sue you for all your worth.

[Citizen Koba]

The relationship between DAZN promoter of choice, Matchroom’s Eddie Hearn and London-based YouTube boxing channel IFL looks especially troubling under a microscope. IFL co-founder Kugan Cassius is sponsored by MTK Global—a management company that represents fighters doing business with Hearn. So, essentially, one business partner is interviewing another and it’s being passed off as news content. According to several media members contacted for this article, IFL receives unprecedented access to events and is even allowed to film in areas off limits to video recording by other media outlets.

But this kind of relationship between media and DAZN seems shockingly standard procedure.

“[It] begs the question, are you media or do you work for them?” said the media insider.


1) mtk global manage Tyson Fury and BJS and a number of others across promotions.
IFL are also sponsored by Frank Warren.

so really what this article states is an attempt to give matchroom a reputation of trying to monopolise the sport.

'mtk global work with matchroom'
they also work with anyone else inc top rank.



2)
the reason why ifl are given preferential treatment by matchroom is because they're professionals with solid numbers on youtube and an established relationship. take for example the big titted mexican girl...she isnt friends with eddie hearn, yet she is professional and friendly. She's likeable basically and has an established relationship with eddie (in the interviewing context lol).

basically if you're a respected face in the youtube boxing media world and matchroom have done interviews with you, you're going to be given preferential treatment by matchroom. They really court everyone. Remember Eddie's done enough interviews with the ldbc guys. However those guys are bad energy too, so he tends to toy with them.
with the ksi vs logan paul fight, these channels made money from all those extra views. that was more like a reward for conducting themselves the right way.
The ones who didnt get access, as obv not liked by Eddie hearn...

it seems they're bitter they didnt get access to the ksi vs logan paul event.


3) you only have to watch ifl on youtube to know they are far easier with frank warren and bob arum than they are with eddie...owing to eddie's age and manner of handling criticism. criticise bob arum or frank and they will probably sue you for all your worth.

It's interesting information but I'm not quite sure where you're going with it. Are you trying to convince me that nothing malign is going on or something? if you are it's a bit besides the point, since I expect all businesses to use every tool at their disposal to help sell their product - that's just the nature of the game - and it doesn't really trouble me at all... although I do kinda find the apparent shilling that takes place on this forum to be kinda tiresome.

[Inspired]

It's interesting information but I'm not quite sure where you're going with it. Are you trying to convince me that nothing malign is going on or something? if you are it's a bit besides the point, since I expect all businesses to use every tool at their disposal to help sell their product - that's just the nature of the game - and it doesn't really trouble me at all... although I do kinda find the apparent shilling that takes place on this forum to be kinda tiresome.

I don't know about paid articles..whether it's Eddie or Dazn behind that. What i'm talking about is the way Eddie Hearn/Matchroom conduct themselves. If you're a known face in the youtube media circles with a good reputation, they'll accept you.
reputation counts for a lot.
if ifl were biased towards Eddie Hearn and dissing other platforms directly or indirectly, WE would know about it..and they'd get dissed. As a matter of fact they have been dissed for NOT criticising/asking daring questions to frank warren directly, like they do with eddie hearn.
in fact, legitimately if i was eddie, i would cut off ifl because they've blatantly been easy on Tyson Fury and Frank Warren, just kissing upto them whilst questioning Eddie Hearn on every decision he makes inc anything related to AJ. plus Umar who works for ifl has gotten ****y and says dumb **** to eddie randomly, acts unproffessional..because he's now a trending name because of Tyan Booth
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PuQyLlh0rwg if you're unfamiliar..but to get the context of his statements you've got to watch this channel from the beginning and catch up.
ifl are basically just there on merit of the old work kugan put in years back.
michelle joy phelps is actually useless..in fact she also talks **** eg does lengthy interviews with men...and they only let her because she's a woman...and then proceeds to run out of things to ask, so resorts to 'what do you think of what eddie hearn said..about you...?'
tyson/frank warren/anyone will be like '?? what did he say, its the first ive heard' and she'll resort to quoting out of context (the irony) just to provoke a reaction.
i hate that ****.

[Motorcity Cobra]

Of course they are... following the whole UFC road map when they got in bed with USAToday/MMAjunkie... Zuffa set up the UFC media group in conjunction with USAT, to put up video player on affiliate MMA websites to funnel traffic back to UFC... https://t.co/WGcr4SIZr1

— Robert Joyner (@robnashville) November 19, 2019

[YoungManRumble]

there's a popular youtube boxing channel called Rummy's Corner, he shills for DAZN pretty hard, and even made a video about how DAZN app is great. Well if he wasn't getting paid by DAZN he's a fool.

He seems to only have just come around to it. His intial view of it was critical as someone his age viewed it as a service you could only watch on your phone or tablet and can't really blame him cause smart tv's and the like can be kryptonite for old school luddite type guys.