5 better active resumes than GGG's?

[bballchump11]

Pacquiao
Canelo
Crawford
Spence
Porter
Garcia
Khan
Kovalev
Fury
Joshua
Usyk
Khan
Pascal
Donaire

Forgot about Pascal.

[Boxing_1013]

GGG doesn’t even have a top 10 resume.

Pacquiao
Canelo
Lomachenko
Kovalev
Crawford
Estrada
Usyk
Donaire
Joshua
Spence

Lol...how can you have Spence, for one, over GGG...0 sense..no offense

[nubianpiye]

Dillian Whyte?

Helenius
Chisora
Parker
Rivas
Joshua

[-Kev-]

Lol I knew you would work AJ in there ...funny stuff.

Yeah GGG would be clearly above most of those guys...but thanks for the reply.

AJ’s resume is better though.

Klitschko
Parker
Povetkin
Whyte

Are better than anyone GGG beat. And imo, GGG didn’t Derevyanchenko or Jacobs.

And Derevyanchenko is good, but I don’t rate him too highly.

[Boxing_1013]

AJ’s resume is better though.

Klitschko
Parker
Povetkin
Whyte

Are better than anyone GGG beat. And imo, GGG didn’t Derevyanchenko or Jacobs.

And Derevyanchenko is good, but I don’t rate him too highly.

Right but we are saying official resume here...if we were just going by results in fights, a lot of people would have GGG beating Canelo twice which would really enhance his resume.

And I don't think you really keep it too real on here so not really too concerned with your opinion on who won fights...SD was a close fight, Jacobs, GGG clearly won really.

Also Povetkin and Wlad were 40...and Povetkin wasn't exactly an ATG anyway...saying that those 4 official wins are better than Lemieux, Jacobs, SD and Murray...I mean OK if you really want to swear by that, go ahead man...that's cool.

I don't see how anyone neutral could really claim that but go ahead my friend...and not to mention that GGG has about 10 more other quality wins than AJ does...and AJ with by far the worst loss/performance...but do you my man.

[Boxing_1013]

Helenius
Chisora
Parker
Rivas
Joshua

So if we are giving credit just for facing guys...how would one AJ be better than 2 Canelos...wut

[Dontbeahater]

Boxing1013 you are grasping for straws here.
All ggg til Jacob's were not even top 50 p4p fighters. Most not even top 150.

No one is buying it. Murray being elite. Gtfo

[Boxing_1013]

Boxing1013 you are grasping for straws here.
All ggg til Jacob's were not even top 50 p4p fighters. Most not even top 150.

No one is buying it. Murray being elite. Gtfo

Yeah Murray had just beat (by anyone who watched really) Sergio in Argentina...that was a really good version of him that GGG fought...probably the best version of him.

And again...boxrec has GGG 3 pfp right now, which is basically just ranking guys' wins based on who they faced...so yeah I would disagree that all of those guys he beat weren't good...boxrec obviously had them up high enough to rate those wins very highly...how can you explain that?

I'm just waiting for someone to come along here...look at the actual facts...and then saying 'OK maybe I'm wrong on this one'
lol

And to be honest I don't really see how anyone can see guys like Jacobs, Lemieux, SD, Murray, Geale, Monroe, Brook, Stevens, Ouma etc and not be impressed with those wins...and then he has about another 6 or 7 good dominant wins as well.

Yeah just don't really see that argument that his resume isn't really solid, certainly comparatively anyway...if you are going to be outraged at those being good wins for GGG, at least keep that same energy for every other fighter out there...because compared to GGG, most of their resumes would really suck.

[bluebeam]

I agree with everything but the highlighted. No way u can rate Khan over Brook at this point. Khan been pure trash since 140.

Atleast Brook got a great win over Porter which looks better as time goes by since he is the only guy to get a clear win over him not p4p Spence or ex Champ Thurman.

And he gave Spence his toughest fight until Porter this year. And landed the most clean shots on Spence to this day.

The most Khan did since 140 was Devon fcking Alexander and Luiz Collazo. Two gatekeepers at best

I agree, but I'm talking about Khan career as a whole has better names than brook. But I agree on Khan resume being trash post 140

[bluebeam]

Lol hold on though...if we are giving credit for close losses on resumes...why would you give DSG and Porter credit for close losses but not GGG for a draw and an official close loss to Canelo, who many have pfp #1 lol...just makes 0 sense man lol.

If you don't have Murray or Lemieux on GGG's list...I mean what are we even doing here lol...and yeah a lot of those other guys on GGG's list are good wins imo...most guys have a slip up when they face about 5 guys like that...and GGG never had one in about 15 fights...I think that is noteworthy...if you don't want to credit GGG for those wins that's fine...but you better kill fighters when they lose to guys like that...and that will keep you busy.

And not that it really matters but I would say Brook was a considerably better win than Khan...just different fighters at that point in their careers...but it's kind of irrelevant since Canelo and GGG's resumes don't really hinge on those fights.

I clearly mentioned Canelo as a highlight on ggg resume.

And resume means you beat guys who beat other guys.

Lemiuex has no signature wins. He was knocked out by alcine and Rubio before ggg knocked him out. What's impressive about that?

And Murray has no signature wins. So what's impressive about ggg beating him?

Khan is a bigger name than brook regardless of how trash Khan has been over the last 7 yrs.

Khan is a fraud but his resume is better than kell