how long is hamed gonna be in prison man? i wanna c him fight again
If only to see him get absolutely ruined. Although Barrera gave him a lesson, he hardly took that much of a beating. I'd love to see him knocked spark out.
nassem hamed wasnt "awesome" being undefeated and dominating in europe is nothing...he came to america and got dropped 3 times by feather fisted kevin kelly..then ****d by barrera..that goes to show you about the level of composition in europe
Lol didn't Kelly have about 40 KO's on his record?
Also its no disgrace to lose to MAB on points? He was a great champion!
Naz was a great fighter, none of this lets play a chess match type boxing he went out to KO his opponents regardless of who they were!
Lol didn't Kelly have about 40 KO's on his record?
Also its no disgrace to lose to MAB on points? He was a great champion!
Naz was a great fighter, none of this lets play a chess match type boxing he went out to KO his opponents regardless of who they were!
Yes - 58-7-2 with 39 KOs. Clearly "feather fisted". It doesn't say anything about the level of "composition" in Europe, more of the intellect of the previous poster.
It's a shame that Naz packed it in like he did. As you say, love him or hate him he always went for the kill and had some spectacular fights. When Wayne McCullough says he's Naz is the hardest puncher he's ever faced then you have to respect that. This is a man who has spent almost his entire career blocking with his face.
I just hope he doesn't drop the soap in the shower.....
Anyone who states that Hamed was overrated or talentless has no understanding of the sport of boxing or is just plainly a 'tool'.
He is easily one of the greatest featherweights of all time, he may have been unorthodox, arrogant and ****y but he was also spectacular and widely entertaining.
Barerra beat him well but so what he had a game plan and it worked, Naz certainly wasn't '****d' he was just outboxed, and as for the Kevin Kelly fight, Kelly could punch (certainly wasn't feather fisted!) and he did officially score three knock downs but two of them were only touch downs and besides isn't that the sort of fight that sells out arena's? Or would we rather watch a Hopkins v Taylor fight?
Anyone who states that Hamed was overrated or talentless has no understanding of the sport of boxing or is just plainly a 'tool'.
He is easily one of the greatest featherweights of all time, he may have been unorthodox, arrogant and ****y but he was also spectacular and widely entertaining.
Barerra beat him well but so what he had a game plan and it worked, Naz certainly wasn't '****d' he was just outboxed, and as for the Kevin Kelly fight, Kelly could punch (certainly wasn't feather fisted!) and he did officially score three knock downs but two of them were only touch downs and besides isn't that the sort of fight that sells out arena's? Or would we rather watch a Hopkins v Taylor fight?
Anyone who states that Hamed was overrated or talentless has no understanding of the sport of boxing or is just plainly a 'tool'.
He is easily one of the greatest featherweights of all time, he may have been unorthodox, arrogant and ****y but he was also spectacular and widely entertaining.
Barerra beat him well but so what he had a game plan and it worked, Naz certainly wasn't '****d' he was just outboxed, and as for the Kevin Kelly fight, Kelly could punch (certainly wasn't feather fisted!) and he did officially score three knock downs but two of them were only touch downs and besides isn't that the sort of fight that sells out arena's? Or would we rather watch a Hopkins v Taylor fight?
I know which I would prefer!
End of story.
But please don't remind me of Hopkins vs Taylor. Depressing.
Comment