Comments Thread For: Canelo: I'm No. 1 P4P, I've Done Better Than Crawford, Loma

[SUBZER0ED]

When you name yourself #1 P4P because no one else does, it's pretty f'n sad.

[Shadoww702]

lol. Kovalev is not the best LHW. Bivol and Beterbiev are better. Clenelo will never fight Callum Smith. Clenelo will continue to duck Golovkin who he has 1 loss and 1 draw against. How can he be #1 p4p when he is not #1 in any weight class?

Bivol is NOT better than Kov. And if they ever fight I’ll back that up with $$$ but will you? LMFAO Bivol is small for a LHW and was saved by the bell against a FRINGE contender. I bet you don’t even know about that casual fan...

[Shadoww702]

You really think Loma lost to Salido the same way Canelo lost to Floyd?

Loma in his second pro fight won last rounds and won the fight on one of judges score cards, while constantly being hit in the balls by much bigger boxer, Canelo as an established pro boxer just got outclassed, heck Maidana gave Floyd a better fight.

I’m sure through your glasses you rank Salido higher than Floyd and Maidana.

And LOVE how you bring up Salido size but spread your butt checks for Loma Dic when he Brings guys 1-2 weight classes UP!!!

Yeah I’ll say it your a fkn HYPOCRITE

[alexjust]

Neither Loma nor Crawford had a single disputable fight in their careers. Well, except that one could argue that Loma should have won the Salido fight. Shouldn't the public or pundits be deciding who no.1 is? Humility is a good thing.

[ReggieKray]

Canelo, Crawford, Loma.

[jlopeznarez1]

Crawford and Lomachenko are more accomplished, accolade wise than Canelo is. A lot of people, Canelo himself, misconstrue how p4p works. It’s about accolades, skills and dominance, resumes being a less important factor — to be frank, Canelo’s resume is quite tainted anyways.

[_original_]

Crawford and Lomachenko are more accomplished, accolade wise than Canelo is. A lot of people, Canelo himself, misconstrue how p4p works. It’s about accolades, skills and dominance, resumes being a less important factor — to be frank, Canelo’s resume is quite tainted anyways.

Pure nonsense, resume is the only way to gauge fighters otherwise you're using the dreaded 'eye test' and ranking fighters high based on smashing bums, i.e. Crawford.

[Unified18]

1 guy fought high quality opponents and got a gift decision when things didn't go well for him and the other guy has dominated 2nd tier opponents and bums (Gamboa was a good FW, not so much at LW) ever since he won his 1st belt. Neither guys deserve to be #1 p4p, I dont even like Loma but he has a better case compare to these 2.

[Boxing Goat]

Life and death with Lara, cop yourself on, that gazelle was running all night, hardly life and death, more a frustrating fight.

Ok, barely beating him if he actually did beat him. It's pretty obvious what I meant wasn't it?

[Boxing Goat]

Canelo, Crawford, Loma.

Correct. But in reverse order.

That's a fact too, btw. Not just my opinion.