Nate Diaz exonerated by USADA, cleared to fight..proves WBC/VADA is inconsistent

[Thuglife Nelo]

So Nate Diaz the previous week was flagged with an atypical finding. Fight is compromised....However, it was below the “threshold” for benefit consideration. Meaning, given the day to the fight, the Anti Doping World made it clear that an atypical finding below the threshold wouldn’t benefit Nate this weekend...

Therefore, this is the same logic applied to Dillian Whyte as of late...

The same Lab in Utah, SMRTL, verified the results to USADA, same lab whom did Canelo and confirmed Meat Contamination. And you wonder why Canelo ran up all gangsta on GGG for conspiring false allegations for what the medical world sees as non beneficial and Nelo deserved benefit of doubt..

In any of these two cases, how in the hell would Canelo benefit from a now WADA rule that states that Canelo’s levels were too low for beneficial gain 78 days away from a fight? Canelo would still be tested as the weeks went on. Again, the WBC just wanting a bigger cut for when Loeffler forced GBP to renegotiate or else no fight.

Canelo - 78 days way... WBC VADA conspire - conflicts of interest - to discipline Canelo for continually refusing the WBC strap offerings

Whyte and Diaz, findings WITHIN the week of fight day...

And that’s all she wrote!!

[Phenom]

No one buying it mate...

Also mexicans don't like you #facts

[Thuglife Nelo]

No one buying it mate...

Also mexicans don't like you #facts

Nobody buying it? Lol USADA did. Or is it only Floyd whom benefits from USADA disbelief?

[Zaroku]

Nobody buying it? Lol USADA did. Or is it only Floyd whom benefits from USADA disbelief?

i can piss clean after a pnone call.. i pissed a dirty on purpouse.. back in the day. to tell tell a federal judge he was a lying piece of chit..

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1997-nov-07-mn-51145-story.html

his court reporters cried as i spoke about how he let people lie.

i f i meet you . and we eat in mexico.. we both fail usada, and all drug tests..

i kinda like the idea of use chemicals to be the best you can can possibly be... my locker mate.. john tuggle ... rip..

https://www.californiagoldenblogs.com/2012/4/18/2826999/john-tuggle-cals-extraordinary-mr-irrelevant

we called him mr salami.. for good reason.. he was da man... we both went to CAL.. he went pro.. i tried walking on.. sat that bench.. too much info i know..

but in Mexico.. making an edibile animal big.. means you buy your daughter a better pair of chiny choose shiny shoes..

i grew up with guys like lawrence taylor.. friend til this day.. all people want.. is the chance to make that money.. while they can..

i tell and advise hoes.. jap hoes.. find a man fast.. your poon has an experiation date..

i got one too.

sanctioning bodies are like the un of bull chit.. lip service.. ya aya aayyya aya and den who cares.. they are buy able.. in japan.. the jap gove bought the ioc with gives.. puoonn. gold.. etc..

politics.. knowing where and when to pay that vig.. then you golden.. even if you lose.. you win..

[Citizen Koba]

So Nate Diaz the previous week was flagged with an atypical finding. Fight is compromised....However, it was below the “threshold” for benefit consideration. Meaning, given the day to the fight, the Anti Doping World made it clear that an atypical finding below the threshold wouldn’t benefit Nate this weekend...

Therefore, this is the same logic applied to Dillian Whyte as of late...

The same Lab in Utah, SMRTL, verified the results to USADA, same lab whom did Canelo and confirmed Meat Contamination. And you wonder why Canelo ran up all gangsta on GGG for conspiring false allegations for what the medical world sees as non beneficial and Nelo deserved benefit of doubt..

In any of these two cases, how in the hell would Canelo benefit from a now WADA rule that states that Canelo’s levels were too low for beneficial gain 78 days away from a fight? Canelo would still be tested as the weeks went on. Again, the WBC just wanting a bigger cut for when Loeffler forced GBP to renegotiate or else no fight.

Canelo - 78 days way... WBC VADA conspire - conflicts of interest - to discipline Canelo for continually refusing the WBC strap offerings

Whyte and Diaz, findings WITHIN the week of fight day...

And that’s all she wrote!!

You continue to mis-sell this ruling. It's nothing about the levels being 'too low to effect performance' or 'non beneficial'. That's a ridiculous statement. After all the levels of a drug present it the system at any given time are a simple corollary of the time passed since the drug was administered or ingested.

You could damn well eat a bucketful of pure Clen and if that shit didn't kill you, eventually it would metabolise to a level which would be described as trace.

The WADA ruling isn't in any way about saying that certain levels of the substance are allowable or don't provide an advantage, because if so they would be applying it to all athletes irrespective of locality. The ruling is simply a recognition of the widespread nature of the Clenbuterol contamination problem in certain parts of the world and of the impossibility - with current methods- of definitively establishing intent.

[Thuglife Nelo]

The WADA ruling isn't in any way about saying that certain levels of the substance are allowable or don't provide an advantage, because if so they would be applying it to all athletes irrespective of locality. The ruling is simply a recognition of the widespread nature of the Clenbuterol contamination problem in certain parts of the world and of the impossibility - with current methods- of definitively establishing intent.

The ruling states that if the results are consistent with Meat Contamination and below the threshold that it is reviewed without discrimination. And again, many of you guys never acknowledge the dates of the findings. Keep it simple, of Nate Diaz or Whyte had traces, of whatever amount close to their fight, isn’t that the TRADITIONAL time for when fighters were on stuff before advanced anti doping came along? In other other words, if you failed a post fight urine test, do we assume the athlete was on stuff that week or during the day of performance vs an athlete with a nano trace almost 80 days away?

[Citizen Koba]

The ruling states that if the results are consistent with Meat Contamination and below the threshold that it is reviewed without discrimination. And again, many of you guys never acknowledge the dates of the findings. Keep it simple, of Nate Diaz or Whyte had traces, of whatever amount close to their fight, isn’t that the TRADITIONAL time for when fighters were on stuff before advanced anti doping came along? In other other words, if you failed a post fight urine test, do we assume the athlete was on stuff that week or during the day of performance vs an athlete with a nano trace almost 80 days away?

The caveat that always seems to go unacknowledged is that 'consistent with meat contamination' is also 'consistent with use as a PED'. The only difference is that a greater time would have to have passed between the drug entering the body and testing being performed.

And below the threshold it is - to paraphrase - not treated as an automatic case of PED use if the testee lives in or has visited one of the few countries where meat contamination is widespread.

Different drugs have different usage profiles, man. This ain't a one size fits all situation. A weight loss / muscle gain PED like Clenbuterol could most effectively be used before camp to avoid wasting camp time on muscle building and weight loss, other drugs might be most effectively used closer to fight night and many stimulants would only be effective if actually used during the fight. And detection windows for drugs vary massively too, some drugs are only detectable for hours or days whilst some are detectable for months.

Once again. I'm not trying to allege that Canelo did use Clenbuterol deliberately, I'm just counterbalancing your continued misrepresentation of facts in an effort to claim his innocence.

EDIT: And - err, what definition are you using of a 'nano-trace' there my man? I've noticed you using the term repeatedly and I'm just seeking a little clarity. Although the term can be used to denote anything measured in scales of 10-9 it's also commonly used of a finding which is at or close to the lower limits of detectability. Canelo's were a couple of orders of magnitude (about 100x in this case) higher than that, and were in fact several times higher than the majority of findings typically attributed to food contamination (based on the study of youth World cup teams visiting Mexico).

[Boksfan]

Another example that UFC fighters are on PEDs and USADA is a corrupted agency.

[Jsmooth9876]

The guy tested dirty and then brought the supplement in for testing and it contained the trace elements of the banned substance he tested for.

So they retracted the suspension because he proved it was from a supplement. Did Canelo bring the beef in for testing?

[brick wall]

The guy tested dirty and then brought the supplement in for testing and it contained the trace elements of the banned substance he tested for.

So they retracted the suspension because he proved it was from a supplement. Did Canelo bring the beef in for testing?

no, widdit ate canelo's beef