Comments Thread For: Artur Beterbiev vs. Oleksandr Gvozdyk - Official Scorecards
Collapse
-
-
It's should HAVE been, or SHOULD'VE been. And you expect us to go along with your observational 'skills' when you skroo up spelling a simple basic word... that you've likely been butchering for years?Comment
-
Now get back under your fughin rock
How’s that for butchering you dumb fugh
Hey look punchy I spelled it fugh
SmfhComment
-
Good fight, but I didn't see Gvozdyk doing much body punching. That SHOULD have been Teddy's #1 gameplan going into this. And usually Atlas is right on the money with training and fight night advice. That would've made the difference and won the fight for his charge.
Moving forward, surprising I see Kovalev giving Beterbiev a bunch of problems. Sergey keeps getting better in the body shots department and his highly accurate jabs, so I'm optimistic. Bivol might also do well vs Beterbiev... with his solid boxing, even if he's just average on power. Just so he stays clear of the incoming.
With Gvozdyk... I could see him vs Yarde on a comeback fight. Get back in the gym soon as possible and fix the flaws... work his way back up to title contention. His career is definitely not over.Comment
-
And come on it's just a common grammar mistake tons of people make. Lots of people say "off of" instead of just "off" or write "alot" as one word instead of "a lot" or "alright" as one word instead of "all right" and so on. This is an informal boxing forum that is also highly censored with people who speak many different languages. It's not English class. Throw your boxing knowledge around not your language skills.Comment
-
Originally Posted by PunchyPotorff View Post
should of been
It's should HAVE been, or SHOULD'VE been. And you expect us to go along with your observational 'skills' when you skroo up spelling a simple basic word... that you've likely been butchering for years?
Oh look folks, yet another ignorant punk who slept through 12 years free education WE TAXPAYERS had to pay for. Hey ee-diot, how 'bout you pay we taxpayers back for that FREE education you OBVIOUSLY squandered.Comment
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by PunchyPotorff View Post
"should of been"
It's should HAVE been, or SHOULD'VE been. And you expect us to go along with your observational 'skills' when you skroo up spelling a simple basic word... that you've likely been butchering for years?
And come on it's just a common grammar mistake tons of people make. Lots of people say "off of" instead of just "off" or write "alot" as one word instead of "a lot" or "alright" as one word instead of "all right" and so on. This is an informal boxing forum that is also highly censored with people who speak many different languages. It's not English class. Throw your boxing knowledge around not your language skills.Comment
-
It was Beterbiev that broke him down, to the bodyComment
-
Originally Posted by PunchyPotorff View Post
should of been
It's should HAVE been, or SHOULD'VE been. And you expect us to go along with your observational 'skills' when you skroo up spelling a simple basic word... that you've likely been butchering for years?
Oh look folks, yet another ignorant punk who slept through 12 years free education WE TAXPAYERS had to pay for. Hey ee-diot, how 'bout you pay we taxpayers back for that FREE eaducation you OBVIOUSLY squandered.
Must of lost a lot of coin tonight
Great prediction there spunkyComment
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by PunchyPotorff View Post
"should of been"
It's should HAVE been, or SHOULD'VE been. And you expect us to go along with your observational 'skills' when you skroo up spelling a simple basic word... that you've likely been butchering for years?
Covering for ignorance isn't a good look there, friend. Doesn't matter WHERE you're commenting. Especially with such a tiny word than anyone should've learned to spell by jr high at least. Your deflectorama argument holds absolutely no water at all.
And if you wanna get into semantics you said he spelled it wrong which he did not and you wrote skroo instead of screw which is incorrect and not censored by NSB so no need to write it like that but it's not important and I feel like a ****** ******* for even pointing it out, but I'm just illustrating my point by doing what you did. Anyway carry on. I expected you to lambast me for my score card or thoughts on scoring rather than grammar.Comment
Comment