Tyson Fury reportedly making $15 million for WWE show.

[MulaKO]

Boxing is not a street fight, it is not MMA, it is scored on certain criteria and on a 10 point round system.

Are you unaware of this?

Fury won all the belts, he is undisputed, undefeated and lineal heavyweight champ.

And he won the titles in the backyard of his opponent on each occasion.

And now he can be the undisputed , undefeated and lineal WWE champ
Of course that is if he wins those already decided matches

Gtfoh trying to justify this fughin chit

[D4thincarnation]

This guy must not know who I am

Sonny, I don't give a **** about yer rhetoric. I'm the guy who wrote the most complete resource on not only the rules and criteria for boxing but also the chronology and authorities behind them. Period. There's literally nothing you can teach me I can't prove I already knew.

So move on and make a goddamn point.

And you didn't have Fury winning?

It does seem there is nothing I can teach you.

Just like I can't teach a pig algebra.



I which round did Wilder show he had the better defence again?

[andocom]

There's no word yet on if this $15 million figure is legit, but it should be noted that WWE claimed to the media that they paid Floyd Mayweather $20 million for his WrestleMania 24 match with Big Show, but the actual amount was $2 million.

I'm glad I'm not the only one who actually read the article.

So Floyd reported $20M was actually $2M.
Fury is probably actually making $1.5M-$2M also.

Still $2M for a weeks work while raising his profile, its a smart move IMO.

[Marchegiano]

And you didn't have Fury winning?

It does seem there is nothing I can teach you.

Just like I can't teach a pig algebra.



I which round did Wilder show he had the better defence again?

Show me your published work and I'll show you mine. Keep it up with personal attacks bud. I'd love to go down that road. I promise you can't win.

I didn't say he did win the fight.

Wilder landed the harder shots, he also controlled the posture portion of the fight; generalship.

You have one who won punch count and defense the other won generalship and scorable damage; it's a draw. Anything but a draw just means you favor one aspect more than others, which is fine, it's codified. One judge had a draw, one judge clearly favored posture fighting, one judge favored punch count, simple. I agree with the judge who had a draw. In any round the punch count was so close while the posturing was definitive I can see how a judge would score Wilder even when he landed less. His shots are more meaningful. I can also see how the other fellas agrees with casuals; punch count is the easiest way to score a fight. The two KDs make sure no judge can get carried away in favor of punch count. The lack of winning punch count in most rounds makes sure no judge can be too harsh on Fury for the KDs. A draw was what that fight was.

Too often judges score close fights for one or the other because we love wins. If it's close, it's probably a draw. No one deserves gifts just because they do what you like to see.

[hectari]

Man, keep cashing them checks Tyson.
That’s good coin for what will basically be a few pre planned spots.

Article:
https://www.wrestlinginc.com/news/2019/10/tyson-fury-reportedly-making-big-money-for-wwe-crown-***el-660784/

Its the Saudi Arabia money, WWE did a smart move that money is not coming out of pocket its from Saudis who are hosting Crown ***el. Also good move on Tyson gets paid while building his name up for that Wilder rematch

[D4thincarnation]

Show me your published work and I'll show you mine. Keep it up with personal attacks bud. I'd love to go down that road. I promise you can't win.

I didn't say he did win the fight.

Wilder landed the harder shots, he also controlled the posture portion of the fight; generalship.

You have one who won punch count and defense the other won generalship and scorable damage; it's a draw. Anything but a draw just means you favor one aspect more than others, which is fine, it's codified. One judge had a draw, one judge clearly favored posture fighting, one judge favored punch count, simple. I agree with the judge who had a draw. In any round the punch count was so close while the posturing was definitive I can see how a judge would score Wilder even when he landed less. His shots are more meaningful. I can also see how the other fellas agrees with casuals; punch count is the easiest way to score a fight. The two KDs make sure no judge can get carried away in favor of punch count. The lack of winning punch count in most rounds makes sure no judge can be too harsh on Fury for the KDs. A draw was what that fight was.

Too often judges score close fights for one or the other because we love wins. If it's close, it's probably a draw. No one deserves gifts just because they do what you like to see.

How many hard shot did Wilder land? And in what rounds.


What rounds was Wilder the ring general and dictate the fight?

What a fool you are.
Punch count is not a criteria.
It is clean hard punching.
Judged again in each round.
And neither is damage.
You really have no clue do you

And lets not forget effective aggression.

In what round did Wilder show effective aggression.

[MulaKO]

Its the Saudi Arabia money, WWE did a smart move that money is not coming out of pocket its from Saudis who are hosting Crown ***el. Also good move on Tyson gets paid while building his name up for that Wilder rematch

Not if he gets injured
Which I’m actually looking for a line on that , do you know any

[Rip Chudd]

Hard to believe when not even the top wrestler makes anywhere near that much. I highly doubt a boxer in Fury who isn't anywhere near as popular even as WWE wrestlers is making 15 mil for a show

[Marchegiano]

How many hard shot did Wilder land? And in what rounds.


What rounds was Wilder the ring general and dictate the fight?

What a fool you are.
Punch count is not a criteria.
It is clean hard punching.
Judged again in each round.
And neither is damage.
You really have no clue do you

And lets not forget effective aggression.

In what round did Wilder show effective aggression.

Posture isn't the words they use for criteria either. I gave you some benefit of doubt with terminology. There's whole articles written by judges explaining why they use punch count, and most even favor punch count. Go ahead and give it a search.

Damage is scored, dumb-dumb, that's the easiest way to get a 10-8, do damage. Damage, affect, domination, whatever term makes you happy, I know you know KDs are usually 10-8s, very one sided rounds are usually 10-8s.

Now all you're trying to do is play semantics. Guess yer writing for the third party reader? I really don't give a piss. You're scared of anything but focus on opinion and semantics so there really isn't anything for me to prove here.

When you want to know the history behind the 10-point must, invented by the WBC, I'm the man to talk to.

When you want to argue with someone over terms and opinions I'm not the right cat. I don't give a **** about your opinion and if you can only speak in the same terms you've read and heard through media broadcasts guess what? Youse a casual who gets his information from casual sources arguing with the man who writes said sources be broadcasted to youse casual ****s. Yer a mark son. Haven't ever spoke to a judge about judging.

Let me put this in terms you will understand. If a member on this forum called Marciano a brawler would you correct them with the term puncher because we use that term more often on the forum? That's all you did here ya semantical ****.

At the end, you hung everything on the assumption I don't know what I'm talking about not knowing you're talking to the most knowledgeable member on this forum. Most IBRO affiliates don't give enough of a **** about youse to even talk to you, I know why, y'all done been educated by **** like Showtime and ESPN and are now full of yourself know nothing know it alls.

If I call a heavily forward leaned jab a jolt you gonna correct that too there sonny?

[D4thincarnation]

Posture isn't the words they use for criteria either. I gave you some benefit of doubt with terminology. There's whole articles written by judges explaining why they use punch count, and most even favor punch count. Go ahead and give it a search.

Damage is scored, dumb-dumb, that's the easiest way to get a 10-8, do damage. Damage, affect, domination, whatever term makes you happy, I know you know KDs are usually 10-8s, very one sided rounds are usually 10-8s.

Now all you're trying to do is play semantics. Guess yer writing for the third party reader? I really don't give a piss. You're scared of anything but focus on opinion and semantics so there really isn't anything for me to prove here.

When you want to know the history behind the 10-point must, invented by the WBC, I'm the man to talk to.

When you want to argue with someone over terms and opinions I'm not the right cat. I don't give a **** about your opinion and if you can only speak in the same terms you've read and heard through media broadcasts guess what? Youse a casual who gets his information from casual sources arguing with the man who writes said sources be broadcasted to youse casual ****s. Yer a mark son. Haven't ever spoke to a judge about judging.

Let me put this in terms you will understand. If a member on this forum called Marciano a brawler would you correct them with the term puncher because we use that term more often on the forum? That's all you did here ya semantical ****.

At the end, you hung everything on the assumption I don't know what I'm talking about not knowing you're talking to the most knowledgeable member on this forum. Most IBRO affiliates don't give enough of a **** about youse to even talk to you, I know why, y'all done been educated by **** like Showtime and ESPN and are now full of yourself know nothing know it alls.

If I call a heavily forward leaned jab a jolt you gonna correct that too there sonny?

So ducked all my questions and deflected.

I never mentioned posture, that was you.

Damage is not scored, you think because someone bruise more easily, the color of their skin, because they cut more easily then get penalized for it?


Answer the questions the fight and what rounds did Wilder win on what criteria.

You won't will you, because you don't know and deep down you know you are wrong.