Lol never did care for Max....
Kellerman takes a dump on GGG
Collapse
-
Funny how things change when people change elegience isn't it? All this shows is that Kellerman can be bought and sold. And for the record, he lied right in that piece. He did think GGG convincingly beat Canelo in the first fight and said it. You can't take that back just because the wrong decision was given. GGG won 8-4 in my book and that's more than convincing enough for me.Comment
-
Comment
-
He's judging 35-38 years old though...
There's a reason why he was avoided when he was 29-34.
When BJS, Jacobs, and the other guys were saying: "I'm not ready for him".
And for those who believe GGG wasn't willing to fight a top MW, remember he and Pirog were about to fight and Pirog had to pull out of the fight due to injury.
So, I agree, GGG hasn't looked that good lately, but still has, in my eyes:
1 win over jacobs (super close)
1 win over canelo (not close, clear victory)
1 draw over canelo (or could have gone either way)
1 loss over derevyanchenko
At 35-38 years old.Comment
-
-
-
I never liked Kellerman or respected his opinion. He sets himself up as an expert who can't possibly be wrong bu I think he is wrong a hell of a lot. I think GGG won the 2nd Canelo fight as did most viewers. When Canelo only wins by 115-113 115-113 and 114-114 in Vegas he really lost. Of course GGG is at an age disadvantage. He is more than 8 years older than Canelo, 6 years older than Jacobs and 4 and one half years older than Dervy. If he was 29 and not 37 he would beat them much easier. I could see Dervy winning the fight by a point or losing the fight by a point. Dervy winning by 3 points means the judges were all off by a huge amount and they weren't. Max is the one who is way off and being very hard on GGG as always.Comment
Comment