BoxRec: Floyd #1 all time, Crawford higher than Benitez, Tyson, Pryor, Arguello

[Combat Talk Radio]

Apparently, Terence Crawford is also better than Marco Antonio Barrera, Golovkin, Mike McCallum, Sergio Martinez, Jack Dempsey, George Foreman and Henry Armstrong.

Not sure why, but there it is.

https://boxrec.com/en/ratings?WtT%5B..._go=&offset=50

[_Rexy_]

And this is why Boxrec rankings are ******.

[DumpkinsPlus5]

Revelated...you're a good poster, but a lot of times, it's hidden behind schizophrenia. We all know Boxrec isn't to be taking seriously. I know, that you know that. So, there has to be a point to this thread that only you know. I'm going to guess it has something to do with Terence Crawford, but I truly don't know.

[aboutfkntime]

Apparently, Terence Crawford is also better than Marco Antonio Barrera, Golovkin, Mike McCallum, Sergio Martinez, Jack Dempsey, George Foreman and Henry Armstrong.

Not sure why, but there it is.

https://boxrec.com/en/ratings?WtT%5B..._go=&offset=50

boxrec said it... so, it must be true...

[tangalog2200]

Apparently, Terence Crawford is also better than Marco Antonio Barrera, Golovkin, Mike McCallum, Sergio Martinez, Jack Dempsey, George Foreman and Henry Armstrong.

Not sure why, but there it is.

https://boxrec.com/en/ratings?WtT%5B..._go=&offset=50

boxrec is just being true to itself....it loves to be ******

[kidbazooka]

Lol

That’s gotta be a joke

[pacphobia]

Apparently, Terence Crawford is also better than Marco Antonio Barrera, Golovkin, Mike McCallum, Sergio Martinez, Jack Dempsey, George Foreman and Henry Armstrong.

Not sure why, but there it is.

https://boxrec.com/en/ratings?WtT%5B..._go=&offset=50

Floyd fans won't contradict this

[Combat Talk Radio]

Revelated...you're a good poster, but a lot of times, it's hidden behind schizophrenia. We all know Boxrec isn't to be taking seriously. I know, that you know that. So, there has to be a point to this thread

I really shouldn't have to do this for you.

BUT...since that BoxRec result was so funny, my mood is good enough. I'll excuse your blindness this ONE time. Let me help you out, bro.

You said:

We all know Boxrec isn't to be taking seriously. I know, that you know that.

You know that I know that. Which means you're likely an intelligent person.

So, there has to be a point to this thread

...but then you go and you say this deer-in-the-headlights like you're an idiot.


Let's try it the math way.


1. BoxRec posts something.

2. Most accept that things that BoxRec posts are "not to be taken seriously" (despite the fact that half of NSB used it to justify why Golovkin was superior to Carnelo, but I digress).

3. I post something from BoxRec.

4. Pretty much everyone considers what I put (which came directly from BoxRec) a joke.


So...what is most likely the point of the thread?



...still confused? Ok.

When I posted in the Lounge about Stacey Dash getting arrested for beating her husband's ass, getting arrested and telling the idiot cop that didn't know who she was that she was white AND HAVING THEM ACCEPT THAT ANSWER, what was my motivation?

When I told people that Paulie was going to get worked by Artie Lobov (which happened) and why, what was my motivation?

After Jeff Horn UNANIMOUSLY beat Manny and I shared that two of the three rating orgs (used heavily by NSB) rated him #1 Welterweight in the World, #5 P4P, and even now rate him Top 10 Middleweight, what was my motivation?

When I correctly remind people that Danny 'Swift' Garcia sparked a FRESHER Amir Khan out in 4 while Terence Crawford got taken to 9 and had to low blow him, what is my motivation?

When I expose people who don't count jabs as punches despite Golovkin and others having an excellent scoring jab, what is my motivation?

When I tell people to stop using Compubox and facial damage to score fights after seeing outcomes like Pac/Thurman and Fury/Wallin, what is my motivation?

When I propose a fight between Chino Maidana and Jeff Horn in Australia with Mark Nelson (the Pac/Horn ref) as the ref, what is my motivation?

When I respond to posters who criticize Porter and others for fighting "dirty" and I refer them to Derrick Gainer vs. Freddie Norwood, what is my motivation?

When I shared Shannon Briggs' Insta video calling Wilder a 'drunk octopus', what is my motivation?

When I shared Chris 'English' Eubank's radio show where he said he would 'hand Nigel Benn his arse', what was my motivation?


There's one easy answer - and you clearly don't get it. This is an online forum, bro. We post. But more importantly, we post what entertains us.

Some people - you included, or you especially - take the shіt way too damn seriously.

Now, if you're not entertained, don't enter the post. Move on. It's simple. Nobody's requiring your reply - and frankly, it isn't welcome if you're just going to take the shіt seriously when...

We all know Boxrec isn't to be taking seriously.

[DumpkinsPlus5]

Serious talk!!!

LOL you did not type all that and say I take this site too seriously. As far as, what motivates you to post, I would think it would be to provoke a discussion. That's what I was getting at. All those examples that you used does exactly that, provokes a discussion. That's what I didn't understand. We all know Boxrec ain't to be taken seriously, so what exactly were we to discuss? You had four people respond with "Boxrec is ******," and the thread died. Boxrec is indeed ******...and?

The only thing that made me laugh was Pacphobia's reply. That's the kind of punchline your opening post was missing. For whatever reason, you chose to single out Crawford. But since It's so dayum funny where Crawford is ranked, I CAN'T WAIT for your thread on Danny Garcia being ranked higher than Lennox Lewis. Hilarious aint it? What about Timothy Bradley being ranked higher than Henry Armstrong? I'm hollering! Let's not forget Oscar De La Hoya being ranked higher than Roberto Duran. I'm on the floor!

How many people you want to come in here and say "Boxrec is ******"? This ain't your diary, my dude. This is a forum for DISCUSSION. Excuse me for wondering what we were suppose to discuss. I guess it was so funny, you had to share. That's cool. I guess I didn't find it funny, and therefor didn't see the point. Lighten up

[thesmokingman]

Wow, someone is self obsessed!