I think I agree with this guy. Derevyanchenko won. It was a robbery.

[_Maxi]

1) GGG must give him a rematch.

2) Yeah, I can't disagree with him. No matter how emotional I can get by being a big ggg fan. SD won 7 or 8 rounds in my eyes.

Was it a robbery? yeah, it was a robbery. I must be consistent. Two judges scored it 7-5 to ggg? really? 6-6 I can understand but 7-5? nah, doesn't seem fair.

Can I make a mistake? yeah, but whatever. I see it this way. SD is a hell of a fighter. Tremendous fighter. Props to Jacobs also for beating him fair and square.

[Robbie Barrett]

Jacobs>>>>>>>Golovkin then.

[_Maxi]

Jacobs>>>>>>>Golovkin then.

Devon Alexander > Mayweather

GGG now has the record he deserves.

1 loss is fine.

[R-Hand Southpaw]

6-6 is the way is scored it.

The knock down made the difference.

When you watch the whole thing it seems like Derevychanko won because his work rate was far better than GGGs but round by round it didnt tell the same story.

[Robbie Barrett]

Devon Alexander > Mayweather

GGG now has the record he deserves.

1 loss is fine.

Did Alexander arguably beat Mayweather?

[_Maxi]

Did Alexander arguably beat Mayweather?

They never fought

[Ray*]

6-6 is the way is scored it.

The knock down made the difference.

When you watch the whole thing it seems like Derevychanko won because his work rate was far better than GGGs but round by round it didnt tell the same story.

Had it the same way on my scorecard. Either way I wouldn't call this a robbery.

[Robbie Barrett]

They never fought

Exactly. Jacobs arguably beat Golovkin. So there's a much better case that he's a better fighter than Golovkin considering he beat Derev and Golovkin didn't. Not the case with Mayweather/Alexander.