Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

PAC is P4P #1 atm

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    why would he be p4p #1?

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by D4thincarnation View Post
      Well considering he can make lightweight and fighting two weight classes above, he definitely is.


      And this Pacquiao is 60% of the 2009/2010 model
      you actually think he can make 135 and be effective??

      Comment


      • #13
        Yes he is.. His skill is so much better than the current boxers....

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by Errol Spence View Post
          you actually think he can make 135 and be effective??
          I’m sure he still can.
          He walks around at what weight? 150? He’s a small guy.
          I don’t even think either him or Floyd cut much for their weigh ins.

          Comment


          • #15
            Not p4p no1 for me maybe in my top 10.
            Loma and Crawford are 1-2.
            Take a pick.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by Errol Spence View Post
              you actually think he can make 135 and be effective??
              He doesn't even try and cut and makes 147lbs.

              If he tried to cut he could make 135lbs and put 10lbs on after the weigh in.


              His ring weight has been the same since Diaz

              Comment


              • #17
                we all knew PAC can whirlwind Spence after we saw the porter vs spence fight

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by D4thincarnation View Post
                  He doesn't even try and cut and makes 147lbs.

                  If he tried to cut he could make 135lbs and put 10lbs on after the weigh in.


                  His ring weight has been the same since Diaz
                  His in ring weight isn't exactly the same.


                  For Diaz, I believe he was 147 in the ring. For Tim Bradley, for instance, he was 151, and 152 against Mayweather.

                  To squeeze down to 135 effectively..? I don't know about that.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    You don't need the best resume to be pfp no1. Pac always had greater resume than floyd. But Floyd was considered no1. They concluded that simply because Pac struggled with jmm?
                    Pac s got best resume but he's not no1 pfp now a!though still a pfp fighter. That's good as when.he's fighting and even beating thurman and spence and crawford you know Pac s taking risks.
                    They've got height, weight youth everything going for them. Even with thurman having comeback from injury and not looking great he still was favourite against pac as he's unbeaten, bigger, younger, fresher.
                    Last edited by hugh grant; 10-07-2019, 08:55 AM.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      It's certainly plausible to consider Pacquiao the #1 P4P based on what he has done at this stage of his career, a natural 140lb guy fighting natural 165lb'ers.

                      It's also amazing to consider an outrageous conjecture that Spence advisors privately turned down a Pacquiao fight due to "money" issues with Pacquiao. Money issues.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP