Who was more competitive? Shawn when he fought Spence or Keef when he fought Manny?

[dibzvincent143]

Both came in their respective fights as the underdog. Both gave their opponents fits. Both lost a split decision.

Who was more competitive tho?

Personally I'll give it to Porter. Thought Porter vs. Spence being a draw wouldn't be too bad. On the other hand, Pacquiao definitely beat Thurman even though Keith showed up in the middle rounds and made the fight interesting.

Both were very competitive... the difference was that Porter was totally written off... hence we were in awe of how he actually held his own... he didn’t care about Spence’s skill, size or power nor he cared about looking pretty. i have not enjoyed a fight for a long time

Thurman and Pac was a toss up to begin with because of pac’s age.. and we got the war we wanted.. without the KD i think that would have been a draw and I’m a pac fan.

About equal for me.. or i was just too scared for pacman so i gave credit to everything thurman did

[Ganondorf]

I say Shawn was more competitive.

I don’t know though. I recently spoke with a friend of mine from Florida who thought Keith was robbed. He might be a little biased doe. Lol

[MDPopescu]

In my opinion the Pac vs Thurman fight was closer but Pac clearly won. I think Spence beat Porter by at least 116 to 111 and the judge who had Porter winning robbed Spence.

... in fact, Spence clearly out-landed Porter... (but people tend to support the underdog...)