Why do we have 2 cast EU fighters as old? Marquez, Pac, Floyd, Bhop, Foreman

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Thuglife Nelo
    Banned
    • Dec 2018
    • 26836
    • 1,299
    • 1,822
    • 654,176

    #1

    Why do we have 2 cast EU fighters as old? Marquez, Pac, Floyd, Bhop, Foreman

    I mean Marquez was fighting over 40, so is Pac and crazy Floyd. Bhop, Foreman. What ever happened to appreciating warriors still trying to be gangsta?

    Kovalev and GGG are all of sudden old as an excuse for anything.

    It’s pathetic. What’s with the special treatment?
  • boliodogs
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2008
    • 33358
    • 824
    • 1,782
    • 309,589

    #2
    I only have to see the headline and I know it's you starting the thread. You sure don't give them a pass. You give them nothing but hate. You hand pick a few fighters who fought into old age and try to make it proof that old really is not old. Will old damn sure is old and it will always be old. 25 to 29 is prime. 30 is the start of old and 35 is old period. You're pathetic with all your Eastern European hate. What about Ward and Bradley who retired at age 32 because they thought their best days were over. Do you think Canelo will fight past age 31? New flash for you. Canelo will be retired before he is 32 years old. How are GGG and Kovalev using age as an excuse??? GGG is fighting that guy Canelo was supposed to fight to hold onto the belt he said was important to him. Canelo chose not to fight him so GGG stepped in the fight a top 5 middleweight for a world middleweight title. Why does he need an old age excuse for that? Kovalev is fighting your wonderboy Canelo who you claim is the world's best fighter so why does Kovalev need an old age excuse for that. Every day you clog up this board with endless shyty threads leaving no room for better more interesting threads. It's a shame they don't limit you to maybe 3 threads a day instead of your usual dozen or more threads hating on good fighters Spence, GGG, Loma and lately Bivol ever since Bivol challenged Canelo to a fight.

    Comment

    • john l
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Mar 2017
      • 5639
      • 124
      • 190
      • 54,474

      #3
      Originally posted by boliodogs
      I only have to see the headline and I know it's you starting the thread. You sure don't give them a pass. You give them nothing but hate. You hand pick a few fighters who fought into old age and try to make it proof that old really is not old. Will old damn sure is old and it will always be old. 25 to 29 is prime. 30 is the start of old and 35 is old period. You're pathetic with all your Eastern European hate. What about Ward and Bradley who retired at age 32 because they thought their best days were over. Do you think Canelo will fight past age 31? New flash for you. Canelo will be retired before he is 32 years old. How are GGG and Kovalev using age as an excuse??? GGG is fighting that guy Canelo was supposed to fight to hold onto the belt he said was important to him. Canelo chose not to fight him so GGG stepped in the fight a top 5 middleweight for a world middleweight title. Why does he need an old age excuse for that? Kovalev is fighting your wonderboy Canelo who you claim is the world's best fighter so why does Kovalev need an old age excuse for that. Every day you clog up this board with endless shyty threads leaving no room for better more interesting threads. It's a shame they don't limit you to maybe 3 threads a day instead of your usual dozen or more threads hating on good fighters Spence, GGG, Loma and lately Bivol ever since Bivol challenged Canelo to a fight.
      What he said.

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP