Given his accomplishments, does Crawford have the most underwhelming resume ever?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mcdonalds
    Undisputed Champion
    • Oct 2017
    • 3700
    • 298
    • 11
    • 106,172

    #1

    Given his accomplishments, does Crawford have the most underwhelming resume ever?

    Won titles at 135, 140, and 147. Two unification bouts at 140 and became undisputed at 140.

    However, his best wins are Gamboa and Postol.

    Would he really be a HOFer if he retired today? Idk
  • boxinggod101
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Apr 2012
    • 7404
    • 352
    • 413
    • 70,840

    #2
    His resume is pretty weak for someone with that much talent and P4P no. 1 (by some media). Plus he's already 31 or 32... Pretty weak

    Comment

    • EDDIE SPERM
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Aug 2019
      • 1077
      • 81
      • 163
      • 78,383

      #3
      Originally posted by mcdonalds
      Won titles at 135, 140, and 147. Two unification bouts at 140 and became undisputed at 140.

      However, his best wins are Gamboa and Postol.

      Would he really be a HOFer if he retired today? Idk
      Not sure about him being the fighter having the most underwelming resume ever yet as this supposed P4P king the goofy media portrays him to be he sure as Hell has a soft resume.

      Comment

      • DumpkinsPlus5
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Apr 2014
        • 1159
        • 80
        • 18
        • 28,708

        #4
        About half the people who follow boxing consider him p4p. The other half think lomachenko is p4p. That being said, he has the worst resume any #1 p4p fighter in this history of boxing has ever had. No one that's ever been #1 p4p has ever had such a bad resume...ever

        Comment

        • daggum
          All time great
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2008
          • 43720
          • 4,664
          • 3
          • 166,270

          #5
          its all about the eye test people! thats why tank davis is number 1

          Comment

          • daggum
            All time great
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Feb 2008
            • 43720
            • 4,664
            • 3
            • 166,270

            #6
            Originally posted by DumpkinsPlus5
            About half the people who follow boxing consider him p4p. The other half think lomachenko is p4p. That being said, he has the worst resume any #1 p4p fighter in this history of boxing has ever had. No one that's ever been #1 p4p has ever had such a bad resume...ever
            not even floyd? didnt they make him #1 after gatti? eye test!

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP